Income Tax : The Income-tax Act has prescribed time limit in respect of various procedures, applications, etc. (like time limit for filing an a...
Income Tax : Article discusses about Order which can be rectified under section 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961, Rectification of Income Tax order ...
Income Tax : Proposed reforms in tax procedures: shorten rectification processing time, allow partial payment for appeals, and streamline colle...
Income Tax : If any mistake is apparent from the record, the Income-tax authority can rectify such mistake. An order of rectification is requ...
Income Tax : Apeksha Gupta Sometimes there may be a mistake in any order passed by the Assessing Officer. In such a situation, mistake which is...
Income Tax : KSCAA has made a Representation on Challenges in Income Tax Related to Rectification Proceedings, Order Giving Effect, Delay in P...
Income Tax : Even after due efforts taken by the Government to ensure compliance relating to filing of TDS returns by the deductors, the defaul...
Income Tax : Taxpayers who are not satisfied with the outcome of processing of their Income Tax Return by the Centralized Processing Centre, Be...
Income Tax : Department introduces new facility for online submission of rectification request in cases where processing was completed by CPC B...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance made by the CPC u/s. 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act on the claim of deduction u/s. 80P of the ...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court in Thejo Engineering Limited Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax ruled that denying Foreign Tax Credit despite ...
Income Tax : Notice under section 148 was issued upon assessee by AO for reassessing the cash deposit as undisclosed income, following approval...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that when shares are held as investments, there will be no business income and accordingly provisions of section 2...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court quashes Income Tax reassessment notice against Deepak Natvarlal Pankhiyani HUF, citing lack of fresh evidence s...
Income Tax : Taxpayers who are not satisfied with the outcome of processing of their Income Tax Return by the Centralized Processing Centre, Be...
Income Tax : Instruction No. 02/2016 Section 154 of the Act mandates that rectification order shall be passed in writing by the Income Tax auth...
Income Tax : Instruction No. 01/2016 section 154 stipulates that where application for amendment is made by assessee/deductor/collector with a...
Income Tax : 225/148/2015-ITA-II Expeditious disposal of applications for rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) dur...
Income Tax : INSTRUCTION NO. 3/2013 Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide Judgment in case of Court On its Own Motion v. UOI and Ors. in W.P. (C) 2659/...
DCIT Vs Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills (ITAT Amritsar) The undisputed facts in the present case are that the assessee claimed excise duty refund and interest subsidy as revenue receipt in the return of income and the assessment order was passed on 17.12.2009. The Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of J & K in the case of […]
ITAT Delhi held that if the appeal is adjudicated on merits, then, refusing to condone the delay in filing of an appeal is an error. Action of refusing to condone the delay, but, to dispose off the appeal on merit is untenable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that the interest awarded under Land Acquisition Act is not taxable, accordingly, tax on the same cannot be demanded by way of invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that eligible deduction under section 11 of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied merely on the basis of technicalities.
ITAT Bangalore held that no exemption has been claimed by the assessee in the preceding year as application of income on the purchase of fixed assets. Accordingly, addition doesnot survive.
Held that the non-inclusion of surrendered income in the Book Profits of the assessee as per section 115JB of the Act, was not a patent error amenable to rectification u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that rent received from sub-letting the property is taxable under the head ‘income from other sources’ and not under the head ‘income from house property’.
ITAT Rajkot held that apparent and obvious mistakes in the return can be rectified by filing an application under section 154 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, rejection of such application is unjustified.
ITAT Kolkata held that filing of Form 67 is directory in nature. Accordingly, benefit of relief of withholding tax credit in Tanzania against the tax liability arising in India allowed.
If any mistake is apparent from the record, the Income-tax authority can rectify such mistake. An order of rectification is required to be passed within a period of 4 years from the end of the financial year in which the order which is sought to be rectified was passed.
