Income Tax : Explore key court rulings on reassessment under Section 148 post-2021 amendments, covering procedural changes, taxpayer rights, an...
Income Tax : Written submission against wrong cash deposit notice under Section 148A(b), highlighting errors and lack of independent inquiry....
Income Tax : The Supreme Court’s Rajeev Bansal case clarified the validity of reassessment notices for AY 2013-14 to 2018-19 and introduced t...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court's rulings clarify reassessment procedures under the Income Tax Act, addressing validity, TOLA implications, and ...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court ruling in UOI vs. Rajeev Bansal clarifies reassessment provisions post-April 2021 under Income Tax Act, extendin...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Corporate Law : Non- extension of the Time Barring Date for assessment of reopened cases and issuance of the notices for reopening – difficu...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that reopening of assessment framed u/s. 148A(d) without application of mind and without controverting the expla...
Income Tax : Deloitte Haskins And Sells Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court) The High Court recently adjudicated a case concerning a writ petition file...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court rejected Agarwal Polysacks' plea against IT reassessment under Section 147, holding the company accountable f...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that provision of section 292B doesn’t include passing of order u/s. 148 overlooking error apparent on the...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court rules that a jurisdictional assessing officer cannot override the faceless assessment scheme under Section 151A...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
Income Tax : Salient features of new Section 148 to 151A 'i.e. assessment/reassessment procedure of Income Escaping Assessment...
Punjab and Haryana HC rejects interference at early stage in Anshul Jain Vs PCIT case. The court holds that objections can be raised in re-assessment proceedings.
A perusal of the instruction would show that PAN – AAACK4O32H concerns an entity going by the name K.G. Finvest Pvt. Ltd. This PAN does not concern M/s Kanhaiya Impex Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner’s stand that it had not entered into any transaction with M/s Kanhaiya Impex Pvt. Ltd. is correct. Given this position, in our view, both the notice which is issued under Section 148 A (b) of the Act and the order that was passed under Section 148 A (d) of the Act suffer from obvious errors.
Assessment Order has been passed without considering the objection filed by the petitioner against the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act and also on the ground that the said order is in violation of principle of natural justice by not affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in spite of specific request.
HC held that it is clear that there is no record to suggest that the procedure contemplated u/s 148A of the Act were followed before issuing notice under Section 148
Delhi High Court in the case of Usha Rani Girdhar v. ITO held that Assessing officer cannot add primary allegation in Notice by issuing Supplementary Notice.
Vidisha Singhal Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) AO admits that the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act is riddled with mistakes. He further admits that in the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act, the details of the transactions allegedly carried out by the petitioner were not correct. He states that […]
Mittal International Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) 1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’) and notice issued under Section 148 of the Act, both dated 26th July, 2022 for the Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. Learned counsel for the […]
Rajasthan Global Securities Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) 1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the notice dated 17th April, 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), notice dated 28th May, 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act as well as the order dated 27th […]
SC issued notice and stayed proceedings initiated against Radha Soami Satsang Beas on an appeal challenging judgment of Punjab and Haryana HC
Rise Projects Private Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Petitioner states that impugned order dated 15th July, 2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act has been passed without considering the detailed reply filed by the petitioner. Learned senior standing counsel for the respondents-revenue, accepts notice. He, on instructions, states that as the petitioner’s contentions have […]
