Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad HC criticizes Commercial Tax Dept for not offering personal hearings to assessees, reinforcing the importance of natural...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the significance of personal hearings under GST Section 75(4), backed by judicial precedents, ensuring fairness in assessm...
Fema / RBI : Article explains latest judgement of Indian Apex Court that the RBI's Master Directions on Fraud must adhere to the principles of ...
Corporate Law : A contractual employee is defined under Section 2(b) of The Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 which states that ...
Goods and Services Tax : HC quashed the assessment orders passed by Revenue Department, on the grounds that no opportunity of hearing was afforded to the a...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court overturns GST order under Section 73(9) for failing to provide adequate reasons. The case is remanded for fresh c...
Goods and Services Tax : Orissa High Court rules in favor of Krishna Motors, overturning an ex parte tax assessment order. Fresh hearing ordered due to fai...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat HC quashes VAT order and penalty notice against Malani Construction. The court demands detailed reasoning in the fresh ord...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC remands ex-parte order and recovery proceedings in Breakbounce India Pvt Ltd case, granting a new opportunity for adj...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC sets aside GST order for Principle Mahendra Pvt Ltd due to lack of personal hearing; directs reconsideration under Se...
Madras High Court sets aside the impugned Assessment order passed on short notice, just two days before the expiry of the notice period. The court rules in favor of the petitioner, citing a violation of principles of natural justice. Read the full analysis here.
Madras High Court sets aside the impugned Assessment order for the Assessment Year 2017-2018, citing lack of adequate opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a speaking order within 60 days. Read the full analysis here.
Read the full text of ITAT Delhi’s order in the case of Sadhna Goyal vs DCIT, where the appeal was allowed due to a violation of the principle of natural justice.
Delhi High Court sets aside Income Tax Officer’s order for Assessment Year 2016-17, citing failure to consider the taxpayer’s response. Read the full judgment here.
The Delhi High Court recently dealt with two writ petitions (W.P.(C) 6061/2023 and W.P.(C) 6062/2023) concerning Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17. The issue raised in these petitions was similar to the one in another case titled “Harvinder Singh (HUF) v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
Calcutta High Court asserts that the denial of the opportunity for cross-examination and failure to provide copies of evidence render an order invalid under the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court orders a fresh investigation in the Rajnish Yadav Vs ITO case, pertaining to allegations of bogus purchases under the Income Tax Act, citing lack of furnished information to the petitioner.
Delhi High Court has set aside the assessment order issued against Dauphin Travel Marketing Private Limited. The main bone of contention was the inadequate response time given to the company to answer a show-cause notice, resulting in a breach of the principles of natural justice.
Analysis and insights into the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling on the appeal of Rameshbhai Patel against the NFAC order regarding unexplained money and procedural errors in the tax assessment for the year 2012-13
Delve into the landmark judgment of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Winsome Highrise Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India. Unravel the emphasis on principles of natural justice and the consequences on the Indian Income Tax Act.
