Corporate Law : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of ke...
Corporate Law : Explore significant legal developments, Supreme Court verdicts, and detailed analyses in the Q4 2023 newsletter. Stay informed on ...
Corporate Law : Explore the vital role of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in protecting employee rights during corporate insolvency, high...
Corporate Law : NCLAT rules shareholders have no standing to challenge resolution plans in insolvency cases, emphasizing creditors control and com...
Corporate Law : Explore significant developments in Indian insolvency law with key cases from July to September 2023. Dive into legal analysis, ve...
Corporate Law : Join the discussion on MCA's proposed changes to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rules. Learn how to participate and share your ins...
Corporate Law : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Checklist for Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 & Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
Company Law : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Checklist for Appeals under Competition Act, 2002 Appeals to be in the Form appended to â€...
Company Law : Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman inaugurated the Chennai Bench of National Company Law App...
Company Law : National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Revised Standard Operating Procedure for Ld. Advocate/ Authorised Representative/Party-in-...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi upholds NCLT decision against Rolta Private Limited's assignment agreement as malafide, prolonging CIRP process. Full ...
Company Law : Explore the detailed judgment in the Grand Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Nitin Batra & Ors. case by NCLAT Delhi, including key argument...
Corporate Law : Explore the implications of creditors initiating insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors under Section 95(1) of IBC in ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi rules NCLT lacks jurisdiction to modify appointed dates in commercial schemes once the Company Board approves. Read th...
Corporate Law : Explore the NCLAT judgment in Sanjay Kumar vs. Gannon Dunkerley & Co, emphasizing NCLT's limited jurisdiction under IBC in cases o...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
Corporate Law : Central Government appoints Judicial and Technical Members in National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) for a period of four...
IBC 2016: Resolution Professional, in Law can exercise control over Bank Accounts operated by ‘Corporate Debtor’ only and not otherwise.
Central Government appoints Judicial and Technical Members in National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) for a period of four year
Held that conjoint reading of section 33 of IBC with section 16 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 would show that the authority which has power to appoint a person, equally has the power to suspend or dismiss that person.
Jaipur Trade Expocentre Private Limited Vs Metro Jet Airways Training Private Limited (NCLAT Delhi) We have noticed above that Section 3(33) of the Code deals with ‘transaction’. Agreement dated 15.04.2017 is fully covered within the meaning of word ‘transaction’ as defined in Section 3(33). We may also need to look into the meaning of expression […]
Since the petitioners are having effective and statutory remedy before the Appellate Authority, they cannot come to this Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The Appellant/Amazon because of the violations committed by it, had intentionally not made known the `real ambit and purpose’ of the `Combination’. Penalty under Section 44 and 45 of the Act, 2002 levied.
Printland Digital (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nirmal Trading Company (NCLAT) NCLAT held that There is a difference between recalling of an order and review on merits of the issue decided by the Adjudicating Authority. No doubt that the Adjudicating Authority has no jurisdiction to review its order after deciding a substantial issue but it has […]
Kishore K. Lonkar Vs Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) It is not the case of the Appellant that the amounts claimed are due towards any emoluments/salary for the services rendered by him to the ‘Corporate Debtor’, while he was in service. Though ‘service benefits’ like ‘LTC’ accrue, on account of the service rendered during the […]
Held that in non-payment of the TDS amount by the Corporate Debtor there was no occasion for admitting Section 9 Application by the Adjudicating Authority.
Prafulla Purushottamrao Gadge Vs Narayan Mangal (NCLAT Delhi) The submission raised by the Counsel for the Appellant that the Application which has been filed on 25.06.2021 under Section 7 has to fulfill the requirements of threshold as introduced by Notification dated 24.03.2020 has substance. The Adjudicating Authority has not adverted to the said issue and […]
