Corporate Law : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of ke...
Corporate Law : Explore significant legal developments, Supreme Court verdicts, and detailed analyses in the Q4 2023 newsletter. Stay informed on ...
Corporate Law : Explore the vital role of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in protecting employee rights during corporate insolvency, high...
Corporate Law : NCLAT rules shareholders have no standing to challenge resolution plans in insolvency cases, emphasizing creditors control and com...
Corporate Law : Explore significant developments in Indian insolvency law with key cases from July to September 2023. Dive into legal analysis, ve...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Company Law : Explore the current status of pending cases in NCLT and NCLAT as of August 2024, reasons for delays, and the government's strategi...
Corporate Law : Join the discussion on MCA's proposed changes to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rules. Learn how to participate and share your ins...
Corporate Law : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Checklist for Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 & Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
Company Law : NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Checklist for Appeals under Competition Act, 2002 Appeals to be in the Form appended to �...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi upholds the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority to determine fees and expenses of the Resolution Professional i...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi held that electricity supply by NPCL, being in nature of supply of essential goods, was necessary to be continued duri...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that personal liability cannot be fastened on Resolution Professional for any payment made after CIRP, where such...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi ruled that financial creditors who are allottees under RERA must meet the threshold criteria to file a Section 7 appli...
Corporate Law : Read the full text of the NCLAT judgment/order in A. Vijayan & Ors. vs Silver Line Retreat Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Understand why the tri...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
Held that the decision in regard to appointment of IRP as RP or replacement of IRP by another RP falling within the ambit of Section 22 of I&B Code, 2016 is a decision based on commercial wisdom of CoC. Thus, decision of the CoC, in accordance with law the same cannot be interfered with by the Tribunals
Held that the Corporate Debtor was permitted to use the trademark of KKR in relation to its licensed products, accordingly, there was temporary transfer/permission to use, constituting provision of service. Hence, due and payable arising out of such service is an operational debt
Held that only creditors who triggered the corporate insolvency resolution process can be impleaded as parties. An Appellant / Plaintiff in a given legal proceeding is the dominus litis.
Held that there was no dispute on the date of filing of the application u/s. 9 of the IBC nor at the stage of notice u/s. 8 of the IBC any dispute was raised. Thus, NCLT has committed error in outrightly rejecting the application under Section 9 of the IBC.
Held that CIRP cannot be allowed to continue for indefinite period. Refusal to approve the resolution plan due to non-serious, casual and non-diligent conduct of the resolution applicant is within the four corners of law.
Held that the mobilization advance given by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor is clearly an Operational Debt and the Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting the claim of the Appellant as an Operational Debt.
Held that minimum threshold limit of INR 1 Crore for maintainability of application for CIRP proceedings u/s 9 of IBC includes both principal debt as well as interest on delayed payment.
Held that contention that during moratorium imposed u/s 14 of IBC, Adjudicating authority shall not pass an order u/s 66 of IBC, is without any merit
Zoom Communications Pvt. Ltd Vs Par Excellence Real Estate Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT in the present case are considering the initiation of the CIRP, the Adjudicating Authority had sufficient reason to believe that debt itself is doubtful. No error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority in refusing to initiate the CIRP on such suspicious […]
Held that the residuary jurisdiction of the NCLT under Section 60(5) (c) of the IBC provides it a wide jurisdiction and can be exercised as long as the matter is not dehors the insolvency proceedings.
