Company Law : The transition to the new MCA portal disrupted statutory filings due to login, DSC, and payment failures. The key takeaway is that...
Company Law : MCA V3 launches revised MGT-7 for FY 2024-25. PAN, Folio, and validation sheet are mandatory for shareholders; external Excel use ...
Company Law : MCA has updated annual forms MGT-7A and AOC-4 with new requirements for business activity codes, registered office details and sha...
Company Law : A summary of the new MGT-7 annual return form on the MCA's V3 portal, detailing the shift to a web-based system, new disclosure re...
Company Law : Erroneous MCA data classifying Independent Directors as 'Directors' leads to legal issues, prompting a systemic correction to prot...
Company Law : The update addresses repetitive annual KYC filings for directors. It allows filing once every three years, significantly reducing ...
Company Law : The upgraded MCA21 V3 portal processed over 3.84 crore filings in five years and resolved 98% of helpdesk grievances in FY 2025-26...
Company Law : The government has approved new regional and company registries to streamline administration and improve access. The move aims to ...
Corporate Law : SFIO now issues digitally generated Summons/Notices with QR codes and DINs, allowing recipients to verify authenticity online and ...
Company Law : ICSI reports numerous technical issues—including OTP failures, data errors, and DSC problems—on the MCA-21 V3 portal and reque...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Company Law : A director was penalized for holding two DINs in violation of statutory provisions. The key takeaway is that even inadvertent non-...
Company Law : The company failed to conduct the required number of board meetings and exceeded statutory time gaps. The key takeaway is that str...
Company Law : Filing incorrect details in statutory forms attracts penalties even if later corrected. The key takeaway is that rectification doe...
Company Law : The case involved non-maintenance of a functional registered office, evidenced by undelivered official communication. The authorit...
Company Law : The case addressed prolonged possession of two DINs due to an inadvertent mistake. The authority imposed a ₹48,958 penalty, hold...
Government of Indias Ministry of Corporate Affairs penalizes Waheguru Coal Pvt Ltd for violating Section 92(4) of the Companies Act 2013. Detailed analysis and consequences.
Explore the adjudication order under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, against Petron Minerals & Metals Limited by the Registrar of Companies, Uttar Pradesh.
Wurknet Pvt Ltd fined under Section 454 for contravening Sections 101 and 118 of the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis of the ROC Mumbai order.
Discover how WURKNET Pvt Ltd faced penalties under Sections 101 and 118 of the Companies Act for procedural violations. Understand the implications and legal repercussions in detail.
Government of India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs imposes penalties on DGR Farms & Leisures Limited and its directors for violating the Companies Act by failing to file annual returns. Details here.
DGR Farms & Leisures Limited failed to file balance sheets for 4 years. The company and its directors must now pay a penalty of ₹1.68 lakh to ₹2 lakh each. This order by the Registrar of Companies highlights the importance of filing financial statements on time.
Nipponzone Securities Pvt Ltd fined ₹4 lakh for not addressing audit remarks as per Section 134(3)(f) of the Companies Act, 2013. Details of the adjudication order.
Authorized Representative of the company highlighted the company’s status as a private limited entity during the fiscal year 2015-16, arguing that the provisions concerning the constitution of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee were inapplicable.
Explore the penalty order issued by the Adjudicating Officer against Krazzy Fin Pvt Ltd for violating Section 62(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. Understand the case details and implications.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not having a registered office for over 1000 days, violating the Companies Act. This case highlights the importance of companies maintaining a registered office.
