Corporate Law : Learn about IBBI's new rule for generating a unique Valuation Report Identification Number (VRIN) for valuations under the Insolve...
CA, CS, CMA : Highlights from August 5-11, 2024: Income Tax exemptions, GST updates, SEBI guidelines, and RBI monetary policy changes....
Corporate Law : Explore how the NCLT's inherent power to recall orders under the IBC ensures justice by addressing procedural errors. Learn about ...
Corporate Law : Explore the pros and cons of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Understand its impact on insolvency proceedings in India....
CA, CS, CMA : Discover IBBI Circular No. IBBI/LIQ/74/2024 dated 28-06-2024 on voluntary liquidation processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptc...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Corporate Law : New guidelines for the Committee of Creditors by IBBI focus on enhancing decision-making, transparency, and efficiency in insolven...
Corporate Law : Learn about the new guidelines by IBBI for Insolvency Professionals acting as IRPs, Liquidators, RPs, and BTs. Details on eligibil...
Corporate Law : IBBI updates the progress report format for liquidation processes, seeking comments by July 12, 2024. Learn about the new requirem...
Corporate Law : IBBI invites comments on proposed amendments to CIRP regulations, focusing on valuation processes, MSME treatment, voting protocol...
Corporate Law : NCLT Amravati held that application filed by SBI (creditor) u/s. 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of ...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that reassessment action under section 148 of the Income Tax Act post approval of the resolution plan unsust...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai rules in favor of Piramal Capital, allowing Insolvency Professional Entities to be appointed as Resolution Professiona...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that as per section 32A of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Corporate Debtor shall not be held liable fo...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi held that electricity supply by NPCL, being in nature of supply of essential goods, was necessary to be continued duri...
Corporate Law : IBBI amends Inspection and Investigation Regulations, extending the response period to show-cause notices to 60 days from the due ...
Corporate Law : IBBI updates Information Utilities Regulations with new timelines and verification procedures starting October 2024, improving def...
Corporate Law : IBBI's ruled that mere association with a promoter does not automatically disqualify a Resolution Applicant under Section 29A unle...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Disciplinary Committee disposes of SCN against Insolvency Professional Brijendra Kumar Mishra, advising re-examination af...
Corporate Law : IBBI disciplinary order finds Mr. Vijendra Kumar Jain guilty of negligence and failure in handling claims under CIRP, with implica...
Insolvency professionals being the main link with IBBI in relation to processes under the Code wherefrom such litigations arise. It is, therefore, deemed appropriate that the Insolvency Professionals to proactively provide prompt information and papers to IBBI to enable it to examine the provision of statute under question with a view to implead itself for appropriate defence.
Limitation is to be counted not from the date of delivery of the certified copy but from the date of preparation of certified copy: NCLAT
Amendments to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals), Regulations 2016. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board India (IBBI) notified the following regulations on 13th September 2022: a) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) […]
These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2022.
It is important to note that the Code does not have any mention about the possibility of awarding success fee to the resolution professional. May be the renumerations during the process are considered as enough for attracting due services on behalf of the resolution professional.
NCLT held that it is the Liquidator who has to take call on what mode of sale is in the best in the interest of maximization of value of assets.
Adjudicating Authority under Rule 43 of NCLT Rules, 2016, can call for any information or evidence as it may consider necessary in its discretion
The concept of time value of money emerges from the concept of opportunity cost. At any given time, one has multiple options by which he can spend his money.
The Resolution Plan of the Successful Resolution Applicant could not be approved as it had breached the waterfall mechanism of payments as given under Section 53 of IBC and selectively favoured certain creditors without according any reason for the same and the Plan ineffectively dealt with the interests of all stakeholders of the Corporate Debtor and was non-compliant of Section 30(2)(e) and Section 30(2)(f) of IBC.
Since remanding of a resolution plan back to Committee of Creditors (COC) on the grounds of the procedural deviations raised by a dissenting minority in class of creditors, would render the CIRP a never ending process and was against the time bound resolution objective of the IBC.