Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Bombay HC criticizes Pune Police for copying FIR from private complaint, highlighting legal implications and citizen harassment is...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC asserts that Section 498A IPC is often misused against entire families to exert pressure. Employment prospects should...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court ruled that voter ID alone is not reliable for determining age in insurance claims, directing LIC to reassess...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court recent judgment highlights the alarming misuse of the POCSO Act, where cases are filed due to family objections t...
Corporate Law : J&K&L High Court quashes money laundering case against Farooq Abdullah, citing absence of a scheduled offence under the Prevention...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court admits petition questioning Validity of provisions in Finance Act 2022 which overruled landmark Judgment of Supr...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court grants a final opportunity to a business owner to comply with WBGST Sec. 28(1) after non-compliance led to the...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta HC directs GST registrant to file delay condonation application under Limitation Act for appeal rejection despite pre-dep...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta HC overturns GST appeal dismissal, condoning the delay caused by technical issues on the GST portal. Case sent back for r...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi HC upholds bail granted to Sanjeev Malhotra in GST fraud case, ruling against the petition for cancellation of bail....
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court rules that a Show Cause Notice without date, time, and venue for a hearing is invalid, directing a fresh adjud...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Corporate Law : Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific or...
Income Tax : Hon’ble Judges to hear the matters physically at the Principal Seat at Bombay, on experimental basis with effect from 1st Decemb...
C. Prasannakumaran Unnithan Vs GST Council (Kerala High Court) The controversy in the Writ Appeals and the Writ Petitions arose on the Goods and Services Tax regime coming into effect from 01.07.2017. The dealers who were covered under the earlier regime were required to upload FORM GST TRAN 1 within the time stipulated, to avail […]
The issue under consideration is whether the order passed for imposing tax and penalty equal to 100% on areca nut for the release of detained goods and conveyances in transit is justified in law?
whether application filed under the SVLDR Scheme rejected on the sole ground that the demand was neither quantified without giving opportunity of being heard is justified in law?
Passing a landmark judgment on 9 Aug 2020, the Kerala High Court has issued a judgment explaining the process mechanism as stated under section 57 of the TP Act 1882 relating to removing encumbrances created on immovable property. The judgment is exemplary because there was no prior case or precedent established in such cases in such matters and it gives an emphasis on the efficacious and substantive mechanism as provided under section 57 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882.
Sundeep Mahendrakumar Sanghavi Vs. Union of India (Gujarat High Court) (1) Any person can be arrested for any offence under the Customs Act, 1962, by the Customs Officer, if such officer has reasons to believe that such person has committed an offence punishable under Section 132 or Section 133 or Section 135 or Section 135A […]
Vijay Goverdhandas Kalantri & Another Vs Union of India & Others (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the filing of the petition without jurisdiction only to gain benefit of its interim order is sustainable in law? In the present case, admittedly, both the petitioners are residents of Mumbai and the […]
P&H HC orders FIR & CBI enquiry into Builder/State connivance & declares construction of Ambience Mall, Gurgaon illegal The Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Amitabha Sen v. Raj Singh Gehelot, decided recently on 10-7-2020 has not only declared that the construction of Gurgaon’s famous Ambience Mall illegal but also ordered a CBI […]
whether the Government of Orissa in its Department of Excise can insist on furnishing Bank Guarantee, instead of Solvency certificate, for grant or renewal of Excise Licenses in respect of liquor?
April 2020 Union of India & Ors. Vs Exide Industries Limited & Anr. (Supreme Court); Civil Appeal No. 3545/2009; 24/04/2020 Supreme court upheld the constitutional validity of section 43B(f) of income tax Act i.e. deduction is available only on actual payment of leave to the credit of employee BT India Private Ltd. Vs ITO (Delhi […]
Udaipur Cement Works Ltd. Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) 1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a Public Limited Company, having its place of business at Rajasthan, has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ […]
