Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court, in Chamber of Tax Consultants v. Director General of Income Tax (Systems) (2025), ruled that flaws in the ITR u...
Corporate Law : Karnataka HC quashed a case against Arnab Goswami, calling it reckless and baseless. The court noted misuse of Section 505(2) IPC ...
Income Tax : Telangana HC clarified that capital gains tax applies only when ownership or possession is transferred along with consideration....
Corporate Law : Orissa High Court's landmark decision quashes rape charges against a man accused of sex on false promise of marriage, emphasizing ...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court permits ITC claim under amended GST law, allowing rectification applications for late GSTR-3B filings for FY 2...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC lays down guidelines for regulated smartphone use in schools, balancing safety with misuse prevention. Full details on pr...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court rules in favor of an exporter, overturning a GST refund rejection due to portal issues, citing natural justice...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court quashes GST demand for interest & penalty, ruling Section 74 inapplicable due to lack of fraud or suppression...
Corporate Law : Chhattisgarh High Court held that involvement of accused and illegal coal levy matter is prima facie proved and the applicant is u...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is a subsidiary of Huawei Technologies Coopertief U.A (Netherlands). The return of the petitioner was picked up for scrutiny.
The assessing authority, therefore, disallowed the deduction claimed by the appellant towards the purchase of paddy from the said persons and added this to the income declared by the appellant.
Kerala High Court held that assessment and penalty order mentioning old address of the appellant are liable to be set aside as against the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, petitioner directed to immediately update his current address and e-mail ID.
Delhi High Court held that telecommunication towers would not fall within the ambit of Section 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. Thus, denial of input tax credit unsustainable in law.
Kerala High Court remanded the matter back to Appellate Authority since fact that the grant of discount has no tax effect under CGST has not been considered. Accordingly, order quashed and restored back.
The petitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. An assessment of the petitioner for the year 2015-16 was completed u/s. 25(1) of the KVAT Act by order dated 15.12.2018.
The Madras High Court remanded the case of AKR Academy, challenging the denial of exemption under Section 10(23C) due to an error in filing the income tax return.
Calcutta High Court examines the blocking of IGST credit under Rule 86A in Basanta Kumar Shaw’s case due to alleged mismatch in tax records for 2018-2021.
Allahabad High Court rules on Rule 86A of GST for blocking input tax credit. Clarifies scope, purpose, and limits of actions under the rule in RM Dairy case.
The Madras High Court ruled that appeal limitation begins from the rectification order date, not the original assessment order, ensuring fair review timelines.
