Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC asserts that Section 498A IPC is often misused against entire families to exert pressure. Employment prospects should...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court ruled that voter ID alone is not reliable for determining age in insurance claims, directing LIC to reassess...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court recent judgment highlights the alarming misuse of the POCSO Act, where cases are filed due to family objections t...
Corporate Law : J&K&L High Court quashes money laundering case against Farooq Abdullah, citing absence of a scheduled offence under the Prevention...
Corporate Law : Jharkhand HC directs the state to use its Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants allegedly from Bangladesh in six districts...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court admits petition questioning Validity of provisions in Finance Act 2022 which overruled landmark Judgment of Supr...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that amount paid towards community services and social welfare under Memorandum of Settlement under the Ind...
Goods and Services Tax : Sri Avantika Contractors (I) Limited. Vs Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (GST) and others. (Telangana High Court) Telangana...
Custom Duty : Delhi HC reduces pre-deposit requirement for Shubh Impexs appeal in customs duty dispute over imported goods classification....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC upholds priority of Janaseva Sahakari Bank's secured interest over Sales Tax Dept’s claims, setting aside the mutation...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court quashes reassessment notices for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15, citing procedural lapses and lack of valid grounds unde...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Corporate Law : Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific or...
Income Tax : Hon’ble Judges to hear the matters physically at the Principal Seat at Bombay, on experimental basis with effect from 1st Decemb...
CIT Vs KMC Speciality Hospitals India Ltd (Madras High Court) It can be said that, current depreciation is deductible in the first place from the income of the business to which it relates. If such depreciation amount is larger than the amount of the profits of that business, then such excess comes for absorption from […]
PCIT Vs Adani Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Gujarat High Court) Revenue contended that provisional fees was not being treated as income during the year by ignoring the Section 199 of the Act read with Rule 37BA of the Rules. Admittedly there is no provision under the Act to tax the same income twice as […]
Recovery from a legal representative not from his/her assets in the recovery proceedings but from the assets of the deceased. Issue a writ , order or direction commanding the respondents to compensate the petitioner for mental agony and harassment caused solely on account of grossly illegal acts of the said respondents and its officers for […]
In view of above aspects, we find that a prima facie case has been made out by the petitioner. Considering the balance of convenience and irreparable loss that the petitioner may suffer, further process pursuant to the order dated 24.03.2021 under Section 263 of the IT Act shall remain stayed until further order(s).
United Construction Co. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) 1. Delhi HC has issued notice and directed the Secretary, Revenue to file an affidavit as to why FORMS GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 have not been made operational despite the CGST having come into force four years ago. 2. The High Court noted that non-uploading of […]
Aswathanarayana & Eswara Vs DCIT (Madras High Court) Expenditure incurred by assessee-firm on partner’s foreign education was to be allowed as deduction when such education was directly related to profession carried on by firm – Madras HC Legal Provisions involved Any expenditure not being in the nature of personal expenses of the assessee laid out […]
CMJ Breweries Private Limited Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court) it is submitted by Dr. Saraf that the pre-condition to be present for invoking the Section 263 of the IT Act is absent in this case inasmuch as there is no prima facie satisfaction by the Principal Commissioner on the basis of the materials […]
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Guwahati High Court) Whichever way we look at this dispute, what goes to the root of the present dispute is as to at what rate the duty was liable to be paid by the assessee, i.e. whether it was a duty liable to be paid on […]
In M/s. Sony India (P) Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ petition no. 4793 of 2021 dated August 12, 2021] the Hon’ble Telangana High Court directed the Custom Commissioner to amend the Bill of Entry (BOE) so as to enable the Importer to claim refund of excess Countervailing Duty (CVD) paid. Facts: M/s Sony India […]
Powers under Section 83 of the GST Act with regard to provisional attachment could be exercised only during pendency of proceedings either under sections 62 or Section 63 or Section 64 or Section 67 or Section 73 or Section 74.
