Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Income Tax : Delhi HC ruled WGF Financial Services can't claim bad debt deduction under Sec. 36(1)(vii) as furnishing guarantees wasn't its reg...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court, in Chamber of Tax Consultants v. Director General of Income Tax (Systems) (2025), ruled that flaws in the ITR u...
Corporate Law : Karnataka HC quashed a case against Arnab Goswami, calling it reckless and baseless. The court noted misuse of Section 505(2) IPC ...
Income Tax : Telangana HC clarified that capital gains tax applies only when ownership or possession is transferred along with consideration....
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court invalidates GST assessment order due to lack of an official signature and DIN, citing Supreme Court and ...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat High Court rules in favor of Gujarat State Police Housing Corp, allowing a GST refund despite exceeding the two-year statu...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court held that the Baggage Rules would have limited application to foreign nationals and as jewellery is part of perso...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that passing of ex-parte order without affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee is...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment without fresh tangible material based upon mere change of opinion is unsustain...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Petitioner submits that the respondent issued an ASMT-10 notice dated 03.07.2023, indicating a mismatch between the amounts in FORM 26AS and FORM GSTR-1, which comes to Rs.69 lakhs.
Madras High Court held that order confirming tax liability and imposing penalty on ground of mismatch of input tax claim between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A set aside as order passed without giving opportunity of being heard.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that prima facie investigation cannot be basis of an order of cancellation of GST registration. Drastic penalty of cancellation of GST registration can be imposed only after completion of investigation.
Madras High Court held that benefit of section 10B of the Income Tax Act available even before setting off of unabsorbed depreciation and brought-forward losses. Accordingly, matter decided in favour of assessee.
Madras High Court held that order set aside as petitioner was unaware of notices being uploaded on GST common portal. Accordingly, respondent directed to pass fresh order on merits.
Delhi High Court held that initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as impugned notice issued in the name of dead person.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside an order under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act after a notice was sent to the wrong address. Case remanded for fresh adjudication.
Calcutta HC remands GST case after consultant’s failure to inform petitioner of SCN. The court set aside the order u/s 73(9) CGST Act, for fresh consideration.
Allahabad HC quashes GST demand orders against Anand Swaroop Rastogi. Orders based solely on Income Tax findings, lacking independent verification, are invalid.
Allahabad HC rules non-filing of a certified copy in e-appeals is a technical issue, not grounds for dismissal. Appeal must be heard on merit.
