Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court, in Chamber of Tax Consultants v. Director General of Income Tax (Systems) (2025), ruled that flaws in the ITR u...
Corporate Law : Karnataka HC quashed a case against Arnab Goswami, calling it reckless and baseless. The court noted misuse of Section 505(2) IPC ...
Income Tax : Telangana HC clarified that capital gains tax applies only when ownership or possession is transferred along with consideration....
Corporate Law : Orissa High Court's landmark decision quashes rape charges against a man accused of sex on false promise of marriage, emphasizing ...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court permits ITC claim under amended GST law, allowing rectification applications for late GSTR-3B filings for FY 2...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC lays down guidelines for regulated smartphone use in schools, balancing safety with misuse prevention. Full details on pr...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court rules in favor of an exporter, overturning a GST refund rejection due to portal issues, citing natural justice...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court quashes GST demand for interest & penalty, ruling Section 74 inapplicable due to lack of fraud or suppression...
Corporate Law : Chhattisgarh High Court held that involvement of accused and illegal coal levy matter is prima facie proved and the applicant is u...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Assessee-company was engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of Inverters & Batteries and had its factory premises in Himachal Pradesh. For running its operations, it had availed various facilities from financial creditors and also with SBI.
Madras High Court held that matter of mismatch of ITC between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 remanded back for fresh consideration since non-appearance on the part of the assessee was due to the fact that accountant was not doing well.
The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture of paper, paperboard in India with focus on recycled grades and specializes in the manufacture of duplex boards, kraft paper, writing and printing papers.
Gujarat High Court quashes VAT Tribunal’s pre-deposit order in Laxmi Dye Chem case, restoring revision applications for further proceedings.
In the impugned order it has been held that supply of free power is nothing but “consideration” towards licensing services rendered by the State Governments. The correctness of this view is assailed in the Writ Petition.
The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 13.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the financial year 2018-19.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that continuation of order of attachment and Garnishee impermissible since petitioner has preferred an appeal against the assessment order and has paid 10% of the disputed tax as required under section 107 of the CGST Act.
The petitioners prays that directions be issued to the respondents to refund an amount of ₹22,00,000/-, which the petitioners claim that they were coerced to deposit during the course of search conducted by the respondents.
Madras High Court held that matter regarding denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) u/s. 16(4) of the CGST Act is remanded back in terms of Clauses 114 and 146 of the Finance (No.2) Bill, 2024 and enacted in the Finance Act, 2024.
Madras High Court held that imposition of interest for belated filing of GSTR-3B return without affording sufficient opportunity is unjustifiable and hence the order set aside and matter is remanded back for fresh consideration.
