Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court, in Chamber of Tax Consultants v. Director General of Income Tax (Systems) (2025), ruled that flaws in the ITR u...
Corporate Law : Karnataka HC quashed a case against Arnab Goswami, calling it reckless and baseless. The court noted misuse of Section 505(2) IPC ...
Income Tax : Telangana HC clarified that capital gains tax applies only when ownership or possession is transferred along with consideration....
Corporate Law : Orissa High Court's landmark decision quashes rape charges against a man accused of sex on false promise of marriage, emphasizing ...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court permits ITC claim under amended GST law, allowing rectification applications for late GSTR-3B filings for FY 2...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC lays down guidelines for regulated smartphone use in schools, balancing safety with misuse prevention. Full details on pr...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court rules in favor of an exporter, overturning a GST refund rejection due to portal issues, citing natural justice...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court quashes GST demand for interest & penalty, ruling Section 74 inapplicable due to lack of fraud or suppression...
Corporate Law : Chhattisgarh High Court held that involvement of accused and illegal coal levy matter is prima facie proved and the applicant is u...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Allahabad HC set aside the GST demand and penalty in Party Time Hospitality Vs State of U.P. case, remanding it for fresh hearing in accordance with GST Act.
Allahabad HC: Excess stock findings during surveys under GST cannot invoke Section 130 without proven tax evasion intent. Tax determination under Section 73/74 applies.
Madras High Court held that the coinsurance premium and re-insurance commission would not be considered as supply and hence not liable to pay GST. Thus, amount deposited by petitioners are entitled for refund.
The petitioner, aggrieved by the Assessment Order filed an appeal before the Commissioner’s Office and it is submitted that the appeal is presently pending but no effective order has been passed thereon.
These orders arises out of demand notice dated 3/3/2011 issued by respondent no.2 calling upon the Federation to pay an amount of Rs.14,21,145/- and to deposit the same to the credit of respective EPF accounts of the employees of the Federation.
Petitioners sought for an adjournment requesting relevant papers to examine the legality of the personal hearing notice. Respondent No.3 furnished documents most of which were handwritten and illegible.
In my view, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the statutory authority was bound to afford a personal hearing to the petitioner through video conferencing as mentioned above. The result of this infraction would be that the impugned orders will have to be set aside.
The application preferred by the petitioner for recall of the said order was also rejected by the Supreme Court vide order dated 25.10.2019. It is thereafter that petitioner-assessee preferred a review petition.
Allahabad High Court quashes GST demand due to notices uploaded incorrectly on portal and remands case for fresh proceedings per prescribed procedure.
Absence of adherence to procedure laid down in Section 144B of Income Tax Act render the assessment order patently illegal: Bombay HC in Teerth Developers And Teerth Realties JV (AOP) Vs Additional/ Joint/Deputy/ ACIT/ ITO
