Corporate Law : Explore the Enforcement Directorate's role under PMLA, 2002, its procedural aspects, and major Supreme Court rulings. Understand i...
Corporate Law : Explore 45 FAQs on EDs search, investigation, seizure, and arrest processes, including recent proceedings against high-profile fig...
Corporate Law : Explore 81 FAQs on EDs actions in India: search, seizures, arrests, and court proceedings. Detailed insights from ED press release...
Corporate Law : Explore 571 FAQs on the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) functioning in India, covering its role, legislative framework, investigati...
Corporate Law : Allahabad High Court asserts that if Enforcement Directorate (ED) doesnt provide an ECIR copy, it should inform summoned individua...
Corporate Law : ED arrests two Chinese nationals for exploiting borrowers through digital loan apps, charging high rates, and extorting money usin...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court directs Enforcement Directorate to regulate statement recording hours under PMLA, emphasizing same-day examinati...
Corporate Law : ED has frozen ₹6.04 crore linked to the fraudulent TradingFX app, which operated as a Ponzi scheme. Ongoing investigations are u...
Finance : Enforcement Directorate's crackdown on illegal forex trading in Ahmedabad leads to seizures worth ₹242.39 Cr. Two arrests made, ...
Corporate Law : ED's crackdown on Mahadev APP money laundering network reveals staggering assets worth Rs 417 Crore. Learn about investigations an...
Corporate Law : Patna HC rules that ED cannot arrest under PMLA after Special Court takes cognizance unless permitted. Arrest powers cease post-in...
Corporate Law : Held that the Appellant-E.D. is directed to handover and the Respondent successful Resolution Applicant JSW is directed to take ov...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC permits video conferencing for investigations in the Directorate of Enforcement vs. Rajni Kohli case, addressing travel b...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC grants bail to accused in cattle smuggling case due to prolonged detention, documentary evidence, and lengthy trial prosp...
Corporate Law : Since an Arresting Officer had conveyed his intention, reasons, grounds and believe to arrest assessee, the order of grounds of ar...
Delhi High Court held that the applicant is established to be a mastermind of the whole operation only on the basis of statements under section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002. Also period of incarceration and delay in investigation justifies a prima facie release of applicant on bail.
Jharkhand High Court upholds Anosh Ekka’s conviction for acquiring disproportionate assets. Co-accused sentenced for abetting and conspiracy under P.C. Act.
Jharkhand High Court upholds conviction and sentencing of Anosh Ekka in a case involving disproportionate assets and money laundering under PMLA.
While issuing Form No. 15CB a Chartered Accountant is required to only examine the nature of the remittance and nothing more. The Chartered Accountant is not required to go into the genuineness or otherwise of the documents submitted by his clients
Enforcement Directorate Vs Arijit Chakrabarti (Calcutta High Court) Section 41D of the Code of Criminal Procedure was inserted in the statute by Amending Act 5 of 2009 with effect from 1st November, 2010. The purpose and object of introduction of Section 41D of the Cr. P. C. is to ensure fundamental right of a citizen […]
A conjoint reading of sub Section (1) (b) & (2) of Section 50 of Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 makes it abundantly clear that it is wide enough to authorize and empower Director or Additional Director to issue a summons to a person.
Syed Adeel Shah Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Jammu and Kashmir High Court) It appears that in an earlier round of litigation wherein the appellants had challenged the notice issued by the respondents under Section 8(4) of the PMLA Act, learned writ court had declined to grant indulgence in favour of the appellants and the writ […]
It is alleged that rather than exporting gold jewellery in terms of the obligation, the jewellery was diverted in the domestic market and in the process the offences were committed by the appellant.
Jharkhand High Court held that bail granted as the petitioner was held to be not at flight risk and also there was no possibility of tampering the evidence or influencing/ intimidating the witness.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that bail granted as co-morbodities of the petitioner falls in the exception of being sick as carved out in Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.