Service Tax : Understand the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Vishal Tansukhbhai Gohel vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST. No service tax on freig...
Service Tax : CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Shakti Enterprise vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST clarifies that CHA's reimbursable expenses are...
Custom Duty : CESTAT, Allahabad penalizes Commissioner for delaying Tribunal order implementation. Rs. 2,00,000 penalty imposed, and contempt pr...
Service Tax : Dive into the legal battle over corporate guarantees' taxability as Business Auxiliary Service. Explore the CESTAT's decision, the...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Bangalore's ruling in case of Rafeek K.T. v. Commissioner of Customs, emphasizing need for substantial evidence to impose p...
CA, CS, CMA : CESTAT e-Filing Software User Manual explains about New User Registration, User Home Page Navigation, Filing, (Petition/Appeal) ...
Goods and Services Tax : This is the fourth year since the introduction of GST in July, 2017. Despite a sizeable liquidation of appeals under the Sabka Vis...
Excise Duty : The Union Cabinet today gave its approval for setting up six additional Benches of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate T...
Service Tax : The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has directed JetLite (formerly Sahara Airlines Ltd) to pay Rs 100 crore (Rs 1...
Excise Duty : RECENTLY the President of India was pleased to discharge Hon'ble member of the CESTAT Mr. PK Das, just a day before he was to comp...
Custom Duty : Read the detailed analysis of CESTAT Kolkata's decision to quash penalties under Customs Act Section 112(b)(ii) due to lack of evi...
Custom Duty : Read the detailed analysis of Ravindra Soni vs Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) case by CESTAT Kolkata. Understand why gold co...
Custom Duty : Explore the CESTAT Mumbai decision on the classification of imported aerosol valve components under Customs Tariff Items (CTI) 848...
Custom Duty : Read the full text of the CESTAT Mumbai order in MIRC Electronics Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs. Detailed analysis of customs...
Service Tax : Amounts collected towards quality assurance charges for testing the rifles are fees prescribed for conducting the quality checks a...
Custom Duty : Read Notification No. 02/2023 from CESTAT, New Delhi, introducing virtual hearings. Learn about the procedure, technical requireme...
Goods and Services Tax : Applications are being invited for 2 anticipated vacancies of Member (Technical) and 4 anticipated vacancies of Member (Judicial) ...
CA, CS, CMA : Representations have been received from the Bar Associations requesting for physical hearing of appeals. As there is improvement i...
Custom Duty : F No. 01(05)/Circular/CESTAT/2021 Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Block No. 2, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-11006...
Goods and Services Tax : Representations have been received from the Bar Associations at Mumbai, Bangalore, Ahmedabad, Chandigarh and Hyderabad Benches of ...
CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling emphasizes customs adherence to DGFT notifications. In Specta Decor Pvt Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs case, a redemption fine is reduced due to unforeseen circumstances.
In the case of Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs, CESTAT Chennai allows re-credit of customs duty in advance authorisation scrips.
Hindustan Distributors Vs Commissioner of Customs case analysis. CESTAT Chandigarh quashes redemption fine and penalty on prime pre-painted steel coils.
Royalty and other charges are not includible in assessable value if Payment of royalty and other charges not for imported goods and not a condition of sale of goods
CESTAT Delhi rules in favor of Honda Cars India, affirming reduced 15% penalty under Customs Act Section 28(5) if paid within 30 days of SCN receipt.
Duties of Customs are to be charged on the goods imported into India (section 12) and not on the goods said to have been imported into India.
Analysis of Raj Metals & Alloys Vs. Commissioner of Customs case by CESTAT Delhi. Detailed examination of erroneous classification and penalties under Customs Act.
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Chennai order regarding mis-declaration of goods, penalty under Customs Act 1962, and setting aside of penalties and fines.
Dive into the case of Puthuval Associates vs. Commissioner of Customs regarding anti-dumping duty on green reflective glass from January 4th to May 22nd, 2009, analyzed in a CESTAT Bangalore order.
CESTAT held that interpretation of policy provisions lies within jurisdiction of DGFT, whose opinion is binding. Therefore, restriction applied by Customs Department was deemed unsustainable.
