Service Tax : Understand the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Vishal Tansukhbhai Gohel vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST. No service tax on freig...
Service Tax : CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Shakti Enterprise vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST clarifies that CHA's reimbursable expenses are...
Custom Duty : CESTAT, Allahabad penalizes Commissioner for delaying Tribunal order implementation. Rs. 2,00,000 penalty imposed, and contempt pr...
Service Tax : Dive into the legal battle over corporate guarantees' taxability as Business Auxiliary Service. Explore the CESTAT's decision, the...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Bangalore's ruling in case of Rafeek K.T. v. Commissioner of Customs, emphasizing need for substantial evidence to impose p...
CA, CS, CMA : CESTAT e-Filing Software User Manual explains about New User Registration, User Home Page Navigation, Filing, (Petition/Appeal) ...
Goods and Services Tax : This is the fourth year since the introduction of GST in July, 2017. Despite a sizeable liquidation of appeals under the Sabka Vis...
Excise Duty : The Union Cabinet today gave its approval for setting up six additional Benches of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate T...
Service Tax : The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has directed JetLite (formerly Sahara Airlines Ltd) to pay Rs 100 crore (Rs 1...
Excise Duty : RECENTLY the President of India was pleased to discharge Hon'ble member of the CESTAT Mr. PK Das, just a day before he was to comp...
Custom Duty : Read the detailed analysis of CESTAT Kolkata's decision to quash penalties under Customs Act Section 112(b)(ii) due to lack of evi...
Custom Duty : Read the detailed analysis of Ravindra Soni vs Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) case by CESTAT Kolkata. Understand why gold co...
Custom Duty : Explore the CESTAT Mumbai decision on the classification of imported aerosol valve components under Customs Tariff Items (CTI) 848...
Custom Duty : Read the full text of the CESTAT Mumbai order in MIRC Electronics Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs. Detailed analysis of customs...
Service Tax : Amounts collected towards quality assurance charges for testing the rifles are fees prescribed for conducting the quality checks a...
Custom Duty : Read Notification No. 02/2023 from CESTAT, New Delhi, introducing virtual hearings. Learn about the procedure, technical requireme...
Goods and Services Tax : Applications are being invited for 2 anticipated vacancies of Member (Technical) and 4 anticipated vacancies of Member (Judicial) ...
CA, CS, CMA : Representations have been received from the Bar Associations requesting for physical hearing of appeals. As there is improvement i...
Custom Duty : F No. 01(05)/Circular/CESTAT/2021 Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Block No. 2, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-11006...
Goods and Services Tax : Representations have been received from the Bar Associations at Mumbai, Bangalore, Ahmedabad, Chandigarh and Hyderabad Benches of ...
CESTAT Ahmedabad quashes service tax demand on software services provided to Emerson Process Management, citing extended period of limitation.
CESTAT Allahabad dismisses appeal for violation of Rule 20 due to repeated adjournments. Detailed analysis of the impact of adjournment culture on justice delivery.
CESTAT Allahabad rules that payment of VAT/Sales Tax on deemed sales does not automatically exclude the transaction from service tax liability.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules service recipients in India not liable for service tax when the foreign service provider has a permanent establishment in India.
CESTAT rules against imposing penalties on Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd for alleged COO misdeclaration, emphasizing the need for mens rea proof.
CESTAT Ahmedabad imposes penalties under Customs Act for fraudulent MEIS benefit claim by Fashion Accessories, highlighting stringent legal consequences.
CESTAT Bangalore overturns license revocation of Global Agencies, citing violation of rule 11(a) of CBLR and emphasizing due process.
Royalty paid for technology use in production is on net value of goods made in India; thus, it can’t be added to the value of finished goods imported for trading.
Madras High Court remanded Carl Zeiss India’s case for converting shipping bills under a drawback scheme to an advance authorization scheme. The Court found the time limit in a Board Circular unsustainable and directed authorities to consider the company’s documents for conversion eligibility.
CESTAT Delhi rules that issuance of a consignment note is essential for taxability under Goods Transport Agency (GTA), offering relief to Sitaram Jaggnath Prasad Sihotia.
