Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : Explores how arbitration is often perceived as confidential, but legal and public interest obligations frequently limit this priva...
Company Law : The MCA now mandates e-Adjudication for corporate penalties, streamlining notices, filings, and orders. This reform accelerates co...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : Despite arguable points raised, the Supreme Court declined interference since arbitration had commenced before a senior arbitrator...
Corporate Law : The Court held that designation of New Delhi as the arbitration venue amounts to the juridical seat, conferring supervisory jurisd...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether interim protection lapses if a Section 11 petition is filed beyond 90 days. The Supreme Court held that arbi...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether the High Court could interfere with an arbitral award upheld under Section 34. The Supreme Court held that S...
Corporate Law : Rejecting objections on non-existence of the arbitration clause, the court applied the doctrine of separability. Arbitration was h...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
The short and interesting issue which arises in the present appeals is – whether conducting the arbitration proceedings at Delhi, owing to the appointment of a new arbitrator, would shift the ‘jurisdictional seat of arbitration’ from Panchkula in Haryana, the place fixed by the first arbitrator for the arbitration proceedings?
State of Rajasthan Through Chief Engineer Vs Godhara Construction Company (Rajasthan High Court) It is not in dispute that the arbitral award was passed on 29.07.2000 and the objections were filed by the appellant-State of Rajasthan under Section 34 of the Act of 1996 on 21.11.2000. It is an admitted position of law that the […]
Kiran Infra Engineers Limited Vs Northern Railway (Delhi High Court) The question as to whether the supplementary agreement is a full and final discharge of respective obligations under the principal agreement and also rescinds the terms and conditions of the principal agreement is itself in dispute, which requires to be referred to Arbitral Tribunal. The […]
State of Odisha Vs Nayagarh Sugar Complex Ltd (Orissa High Court) The agreement provides for exclusion of representations and There are recitals in connection with or in relation to representations or warranties in mentioning Government of Odisha as substantial share holder in the seller and having had acted through Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Department of […]
Millennium Education Foundation Vs Educomp Infrastructure And School Management Limited (Delhi High Court) The Supreme Court has categorically held that the adjudicating authority i.e., NCLT has a duty to advert to the contentions put forth on the application filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and to examine the material placed before it and record […]
Union of India Vs Delhi State Consumer Co Operative Federation Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Facts- According to Union of India, Delhi State Consumers Co-operative Federation Limited (respondent) failed to furnish the requisite security deposit, as a result of which each of the contracts were cancelled at the risk and cost of the respondent. The Union […]
In a case where there is a dispute/controversy on the mandate of the arbitrator being terminated on the ground mentioned in section 14(1)(a), such a dispute has to be raised before the “court”, defined under section 2(e) of the Act, 1996 and such a dispute cannot be decided on an application filed under section 11(6) of the Act, 1996.
Extramarks Education India Private Limited Vs MES Central School (Delhi High Court) High Court held petitioner cannot be held to be deemed to have waived his right to invoke arbitration under the subject agreements by merely filing a written statement in the Suit which is not connected with the subject agreements and is in respect […]
Millennium School Vs Pawan Dawar (Delhi High Court) In V.E. Venkatachala Gounder v. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple And Anr.: (2003) 8 SCC 752, the Supreme Court held that an objection with regard to a certificate of Section 65-B of the Evidence Act is not available if it is not taken at the material time. […]
VR Commodities Private Limited Vs Norvic Shipping Asia Pte. Ltd. (Andhra Pradesh High Court) With respect to the validity of the arbitration clause in an unstamped instrument, the Supreme Court relied on sections 33 and 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. Section 33 of the legislation relates to the examination and impounding of instruments […]
