Deciding the termination of mandate of arbitrator via application u/s 11(6) is not possible

Swadesh Kumar Agarwal Vs Dinesh Kumar Agarwal (Supreme Court)

Facts- Sole Arbitrator was appointed, on 04.08.2008, on account of dispute for partition of the properties arose. It was referred to the sole Arbitrator. On the request of the parties, the Arbitrator adjourned the hearing on 30.03.2009. No proceedings were undertaken on 30.03.2009 due to the fact that the sole Arbitrator was not available in town. Respondent No. 1 and 3 herein – parties to the arbitration proceedings revoked the mandate of the s

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.