Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 34(5) is a procedural requirement and not a mandatory precondition for challenging an arbitra...
Corporate Law : A Constitution Bench held that courts can modify arbitral awards in limited situations such as correcting manifest errors and seve...
Corporate Law : Indian law permits enforcement of foreign arbitral awards unless specific exceptions apply. Courts now favour enforcement with min...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that limitation for appointing an arbitrator starts only when negotiations fail and arbitration is clearly in...
Corporate Law : Gayatri Balasamy Vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (Supreme Court of India) – Citation- 2025 INSC 605 Overview of the Fa...
Corporate Law : The Government invites public feedback on the Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aiming to enhance institu...
Finance : The Expert Committee has submitted its report on drafting institutional arbitral rules for the International Arbitration Centre at...
Corporate Law : Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides that where the conci...
Corporate Law : Comments invited on working paper of high level committee (HLC) to review Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India b...
Corporate Law : In order to ensure speedy resolution of commercial disputes and to facilitate effective conduct of international and domestic arbi...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that applications to extend an arbitral tribunals mandate under Section 29A must be filed before the Court ...
Corporate Law : The Karnataka High Court held that the arbitral award suffered from patent illegality because the Tribunal ignored invoices showin...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that Section 4 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked where the prescribed limitation period expires befo...
Company Law : The NCLT held that the mere existence of an arbitration clause in a Shareholders' Agreement does not automatically require dispute...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court held that dismissal of a Section 34 petition on maintainability grounds effectively amounts to refusal to se...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court mandates email and mobile service for arbitration petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, effective...
SEBI : SEBI issues guidance to GAIL (India) Limited on disclosing arbitral proceedings details as per LODR Regulations, ensuring complian...
Corporate Law : 1) These regulations may be called the India International Arbitration Centre (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023. (2) T...
Corporate Law : New Delhi International Arbitration Centre (Amendment) Bill, 2022 is Introduced in Lok Sabha to to change the name of the Centre f...
Corporate Law : (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it ...
Held that as per the reply notice, the petitioner has waived the right to settle the dispute in an arbitration proceedings. Accordingly, if the right is once waived it cannot be allowed to be reclaimed.
Held that right to file the application u/s 8(1) of A&C Act, after the statutory period to file the written statement, is closed
Court is of the view that it was an impossible situation for the respondents to have paid the lease rentals timely, particularly during the period covered by the claim of the applicants. In the circumstances, the present is not a fit case where the parties should be referred to arbitration
Derivados Consulting Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pramara Promotions Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) 1. An interesting issue on the existence of an arbitration agreement arises in this application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the Act’). By this application the Applicant has prayed for appointment of an arbitral tribunal […]
National Collateral Management Services Limited Vs Maa Diwri Rice Mill Pvt. Ltd (Jharkhand High Court) The question which has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondent that the similar issue is pending adjudication before the Council constituted under the MSME Act, 2006, therefore, the instant application is not maintainable. This Court, is not […]
Krishna Calibration Services Vs Jasmin Bharat Patel (Gujarat High Court) It is clear that the application purported to be under Section 89(2)(a) of ‘the Code’ came to be filed on 20.03.2014 jointly requesting the Court that there is element of settlement, which is acceptable to the parties, it may be sent to the Arbitrator selected […]
Sanganer Enviro Project Development Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) Learned advocate Mr. Sheth, appearing for respondent No.3 has submitted that in fact, the prayers made in the writ petition would not survive, since after the impugned order dated 26.11.2020, an arbitral award has been passed in the arbitration proceedings being Arbitration Award No.11 […]
Tantia Constructions Limited Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India) Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the firm opinion that there cannot be two arbitration proceedings with respect to the same contract/transaction. It is not in dispute that in the present case, earlier the dispute was referred to arbitration […]
National Highway Authority of India Vs Transstroy (India) Limited (Supreme Court) The counter-claim of a party cannot be rejected for the simple reason that the claims were not notified prior to initiating arbitration. Facts of the Case: The National Highway Authority of India and Transstroy (India) Limited entered into an Engineering Procurement and Construction Agreement […]
Held that an arbitral award can be set aside/ challenged u/s 34 of A&C Act only if an arbitral tribunal’s view is not a possible view and no reasonable person could possibly accept the same.
