Case Law Details
Case Name : Godolphine India Private Limited Vs Um Projects LLP (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Karnataka High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Godolphine India Private Limited Vs Um Projects LLP (Karnataka High Court)
Held that the restriction contained under Section 9(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 doesn’t apply once an application under Section 9(1) for interim measures has been “entertained” by the Court.
Facts-
The respondent-decree holder filed an application under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act before the Commercial Court seeking a direction against the present petitioner to pay outstanding rent and maintenance charges amounting to Rs.1,93,41,675/-. The said application was contest...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

