Application for interim measures once entertained cannot be restricted by constitution of arbitral tribunal

Godolphine India Private Limited Vs Um Projects LLP (Karnataka High Court)

Held that the restriction contained under Section 9(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 doesn’t apply once an application under Section 9(1) for interim measures has been “entertained” by the Court.

Facts-
The respondent-decree holder filed an application under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act before the Commercial Court seeking a direction against the p

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.