Income Tax : Form 46 allows taxpayers to exercise the option for determination of arm’s length price for international or specified domestic ...
Income Tax : The ruling explains strict compliance requirements for specified domestic transactions, including maintaining detailed documentati...
Finance : A summary of the UAE Corporate Tax Law's definitions for related parties under Article 35 and the arm's length principle in Articl...
Income Tax : Finance Bill 2025 allows multi-year Arm’s Length Price determination for similar transactions, reducing repetitive proceedings i...
Finance : The Finance Bill 2025 proposes multi-year ALP determination to reduce compliance burdens in transfer pricing. Learn about its fram...
Income Tax : Notification of Transfer Pricing Rules to incorporate range concept and use of multi-year data to reduce litigation on transfer pr...
Income Tax : Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, affirming that ITAT rightly remanded the case to TPO to reassess ALP of intra-group services, str...
Income Tax : The Mumbai ITAT upheld TNMM for Firmenich Aromatics, deleting transfer pricing adjustments on exports and royalties, and allowed a...
Income Tax : Kolkata ITAT rules corporate guarantee is international transaction but limits transfer pricing adjustment to 0.5% for Tega Indust...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad clarifies corporate guarantees as international transactions, yet upholds Adani Ports' appeal on no arm's length a...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi directs segment-wise ALP, includes Fiberfox comparable, and rejects notional interest on AE dues for Opterna Technologi...
Income Tax : Notification 157/2025 sets 1% tolerance for wholesale trading and 3% for all other cases for Arm's Length Price variation for AY 2...
Income Tax : Notification No. 46/2023-Income-Tax Dated: 26th June, 2023 regarding deemed arm's length price for assessment year 2023-2024. Le...
Income Tax : Central Government hereby notifies that where the variation between the arm’s length price determined under section 92C and the ...
Mobileum Inc Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) since transactions between the assessee and its AE have been found at arm’s length prices no further income chargeable to tax in India can be said to be attributable for the PE of the assessee. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT MUMBAI This appeal by the Assessee is […]
Two-pillar solution for Tax challenges arising from Digitalisation of Economy and consensus of majority of OECD/ G20 member countries (including India) Executive summary Certainty is one of the basic cannons of taxation. With the globalisation of economy when Multi National Enterprises (MNEs) starting setting up businesses across the globe, levy of tax in multiple countries […]
A transaction in which the buyers and sellers of a product act independently and have no relationship to each other. The concept of an arm’s length transaction is to ensure that both parties in the deal are acting in their own self interest and are not subject to any pressure or duress from the other party
The issue under consideration is whether the TPO is correct in considering subvention fee in the BPO segment instead of distribution segment?
If a company is having huge asset base, brand value, goodwill and presence in global market with significant R & D, then it cannot be compared with a company which is purely captive service provider in ITeS/BPO, having low risk and insignificant assets.
Under Transfer Pricing regulation, Safe Harbor rules means binding rules laid down under law which mandates income tax authorities to accept the transfer price declared by the assesse, if opted for. Further section 92CB provides methods for determination of arm’s length price.
Central Government hereby notifies that where the variation between the arm’s length price determined under section 92C and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken does not exceed one percent of the latter in respect of wholesale trading and three percent.of the latter in all other cases
The ITAT Ahmedabad in the case of Gemstone Glass Pvt. Ltd vs. JCIT held that when an associated enterprise is taken as comparable then CUP method cannot be adopted for determining Arm Length Price irrespective of the fact that the associated enterprise taken as comparable is resident or non-resident.
The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 proposed to introduce a more streamlined method to compute Arm’s Length Price (ALP) in a situation where more than one price is determined, on adoption of Most Appropriate Method(MAM). The first and second provisos were made redundant for all transactions undertaken on or after 01/04/2014. This was done so as to remove the vagueness that prevailed in the computation of ALP, by way of arithmetic mean.
Notification of Transfer Pricing Rules to incorporate range concept and use of multi-year data to reduce litigation on transfer pricing issues.
