Ruling passed by Authority for Advance Rulings Customs , Central Excise & Service Tax. The Authority for Advance Rulings consists of a Chairman who is a retired Judge of the Supreme court and two members of the rank of Additional Secretary to the Government of India, one each from the Indian Revenue Service and the Indian Legal Service.
Goods and Services Tax : Explore critical GST case laws from July 2024, including SCN issuance, personal hearing rights, appeal delays, and more. Essential...
Goods and Services Tax : Discover if penalties for contract breaches are subject to GST as ruled by AP-AAR. Learn how liquidated damages impact tax liabili...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. INTRODUCTION: ADVANCE RULING MECHANISM IN GST 1.1 The Advance Ruling is issued by tax authorities to companies/firms who reques...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat AAR rules nominal deductions from employee salaries for canteen services are not a supply of services, allowing ITC claims...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore critical GST rulings impacting taxpayers: validity of assessment orders, denial of ITC, electronic credit ledger blocking,...
Goods and Services Tax : New functionality to search for GST Advance Ruling Orders issued by Authority / Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling on GST Por...
Goods and Services Tax : Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) constituted under the provisions of a SGST/ UTGST Act, in terms of the provisions of Section 96...
Custom Duty : CAAR Mumbai rules on the classification of Dual Mass Flywheel under Customs Tariff Act, addressing its role in vehicle driveline s...
Custom Duty : CAAR clarifies AC parts classification: SKD imports together as complete units; separate imports as parts under CTH 84159000. Cruc...
Custom Duty : CAAR Mumbai's ruling on Dexolac 2 import, clarifying regional value content and tariff change criteria under ASEAN trade rules....
Goods and Services Tax : The activity of transfer of title of goods stored in FTWZ Unit by applicant to its customers in Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) or mult...
Goods and Services Tax : AAR Tamil Nadu denies rectification request for Mitsubishi Electric's GST ruling, confirming no errors in the original decision on...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Authority makes changes in its lineup, appointing Shri. Ajaykumar Vaman Bonde as a member of Ad...
Goods and Services Tax : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan has been appointed as member of Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority in the place of Mr. Rajiv Magoo. FINANCE DEP...
Goods and Services Tax : Governor of Himachal Pradesh, in supersession of this department’s notification of even No. dated 14.09.2020, published in the e...
Goods and Services Tax : Governor of Delhi under Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is pleased to reconstitute the Delhi Authority for Advance Ruling...
Goods and Services Tax : Shri. Rajiv Magoo, Joint Commissioner of Central Tax has been appointed as member of Maharashtra GST Advance Ruling Committee in t...
In re Jaya Lakshmi Tobacco Company (GST AAAR Andhra Pradesh) Appellant requested for withdrawal of application in the context of cancellation of registration. Appeal dismissed. M/s. Jayalakshrni Tobacco Company in their letter dated 13-02-2019 stated that they had applied for cancellation of registration and they no longer required any ruling and requested to consider their […]
In re Divisional Forest Officer (GST AAAR Andhra Pradesh) On verification of the application filed by the applicant ,the following procedural lapses are noticed : The applicant failed to comply with the provisions of Rule 106 of the APGST Act which reads as under: Rule 106: Form & Manner of appeal to the appellate authority […]
In re Concepts India (GST AAR Haryana) In light of the above discussion, the Authority for Advance Ruling holds that the product manufactured and supplied by the applicant i.e. PP non-woven bags are covered under Heading 3923 in the sub-heading 3923 29 90 (other) and taxable at 18% (9% CGST and 9% HGST). FULL TEXT […]
In re Jalaram Feeds (GST AAR Maharashtra) Applicant has stated that they require services of Goods Transport Agency like any other business. Applicant being a recipient of supply is liable to pay tax under reverse charge basis and as per Section 9(4) of the Act, all the provisions of this act shall apply to such […]
In re BMW India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Q1. Whether certain customized lifestyle goods procured by BMW India either from a third party local supplier or imported from outside India for supply of goods during promotion/marketing events organized by the company will qualify as used in the course or furtherance of business in term […]
In re M/s. Network For Information & Computer (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Text and language of the exemption notification No.12/2017-CT(R) shows that the intent of the legislature is to exempt services provided to the Central Government, State Government or Union Territory Administration under any training program for which total expenditure is borne by such Governments. […]
In re Rohan Coach Builders (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) In respect of the question raised by the applicant we hold that on fabrication of bus body on the chassis to be supplied by the OEMs (Principal) on delivery challan or any other owner of the chassis on which bus body will be fabricated by collecting […]
In re Bandai Namco India private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – Applicable GST Rate on operating gaming zone in one of leading malls in Mumbai? Applicant submitted that they are engaged in providing amusement facility services and also running family entertainment facility center in Oberoi mail Mumbai. To conduct the business as aforesaid it […]
In re Bauli India Bakes and Sweets Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) From the collective readings of provisions viz. – Clause (63) and (62) of Section 2 of the CGST Act that, the question enumerated at (d) of Section 97(2), supra does not deal with the admissibility of the credit of taxes paid other than […]
In re M/s. Rashi Eco Tourism Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) The Applicant, vide their letter dated 09.03.2019, received in this office on 13.03.2019, has requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling, consequent to the decision of the Board of Directors of the Applicant Company. In view of the above, we […]
