Ruling passed by Authority for Advance Rulings Customs , Central Excise & Service Tax. The Authority for Advance Rulings consists of a Chairman who is a retired Judge of the Supreme court and two members of the rank of Additional Secretary to the Government of India, one each from the Indian Revenue Service and the Indian Legal Service.
Goods and Services Tax : Explore critical GST case laws from July 2024, including SCN issuance, personal hearing rights, appeal delays, and more. Essential...
Goods and Services Tax : Discover if penalties for contract breaches are subject to GST as ruled by AP-AAR. Learn how liquidated damages impact tax liabili...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. INTRODUCTION: ADVANCE RULING MECHANISM IN GST 1.1 The Advance Ruling is issued by tax authorities to companies/firms who reques...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat AAR rules nominal deductions from employee salaries for canteen services are not a supply of services, allowing ITC claims...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore critical GST rulings impacting taxpayers: validity of assessment orders, denial of ITC, electronic credit ledger blocking,...
Goods and Services Tax : New functionality to search for GST Advance Ruling Orders issued by Authority / Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling on GST Por...
Goods and Services Tax : Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) constituted under the provisions of a SGST/ UTGST Act, in terms of the provisions of Section 96...
Custom Duty : CAAR Mumbai rules on the classification of Dual Mass Flywheel under Customs Tariff Act, addressing its role in vehicle driveline s...
Custom Duty : CAAR clarifies AC parts classification: SKD imports together as complete units; separate imports as parts under CTH 84159000. Cruc...
Custom Duty : CAAR Mumbai's ruling on Dexolac 2 import, clarifying regional value content and tariff change criteria under ASEAN trade rules....
Goods and Services Tax : The activity of transfer of title of goods stored in FTWZ Unit by applicant to its customers in Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) or mult...
Goods and Services Tax : AAR Tamil Nadu denies rectification request for Mitsubishi Electric's GST ruling, confirming no errors in the original decision on...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Authority makes changes in its lineup, appointing Shri. Ajaykumar Vaman Bonde as a member of Ad...
Goods and Services Tax : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan has been appointed as member of Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority in the place of Mr. Rajiv Magoo. FINANCE DEP...
Goods and Services Tax : Governor of Himachal Pradesh, in supersession of this department’s notification of even No. dated 14.09.2020, published in the e...
Goods and Services Tax : Governor of Delhi under Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is pleased to reconstitute the Delhi Authority for Advance Ruling...
Goods and Services Tax : Shri. Rajiv Magoo, Joint Commissioner of Central Tax has been appointed as member of Maharashtra GST Advance Ruling Committee in t...
The royalty paid by M/s Cosme Costa & Sons in respect of mining lease is classifiable under sub heading 997337- ‘Licensing services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation’ and is subject to levy of GST @ 5% till 31.12.2018 and thereafter @ 18% under reverse charge basis;
In re Vippy Industries Ltd. (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) In a revised order AAR Madhya Pradesh Held that The product Preparation of a kind used in Animal Feeding – Bio Processed Meal’ is entitled to classify under HS code 23099090 and therefore entitled to clear the said goods for specific use of Animal Feeding without […]
Of the above questions on which ruling is sought by the applicant, the question at (2) and (3) relates to utilization of credit availed by the applicant and Q.No. 4 is on reversal of credit availed, which do not fall under any of the category specified under Section 97(2) of the Act and therefore are not within the ambit of this authority.
The application is not admitted and rejected under first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act 2017, as the issues on which Advance Ruling is sought by the applicant s already pending before the appropriate authority.
In re S.318 Rasipuram Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd (GST AAR Tamilnadu) As per the first proviso to Section 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Act 2017 the authority shall not admit the application where the question raised in the application is already pending or decided in any proceedings in the case of an applicant under any […]
In re Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Issues 1. Whether there is any purchase/sale involved in the process of auction of agricultural produce (cotton) conducted by the Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society? 2. Whether our Society is liable to pay tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism in the capacity of […]
In re Security Printing And Minting Corporation of India Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) The issue before us is with respect to classification of Heat Activated Ultra-Violet (HAUV) Polyester Film with Adhesive Coating and U.V. Printing”, a product imported by the applicant and further sold by them. Applicant wants to ascertain the correct classification of said […]
In re Lear India Engineering LLP (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether the design & Development services provided by Lear India to Lear entities situated aboard would fall under the category of OIDAR. services. In view of the provision to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, we find that this authority cannot admit the application in […]
The questions posed by the applicant involve determination of place of supply of the services provided, as the applicant considering himself as intermediary, has asked for a ruling on whether the services qualify to be an export or an intra-state supply of the services.
It is stated that the present application was filed in respect of a transaction proposed to be undertaken by the applicant in the state of TamilNadu however on account of unfavourable market conditions and other commercial factors, the applicant has not been in the position to proceed their business activity of identifying land for constructing apartments.
