Goods and Services Tax : UP AAAR rules that cream made from 23% vegetable fat is classifiable under HSN 1517 90 90, attracting GST at 5%....
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad HC: Excess stock findings during surveys under GST cannot invoke Section 130 without proven tax evasion intent. Tax dete...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala AAR rules differential dealer margin paid by HPCL taxable at 18% under GST. Treated as service for agreeing to refrain from...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala AAR allows ITC on motor vehicles used as demo cars for business promotion, clarifying conditions under CGST Act, Section 16...
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Supreme Court's scrutiny of whether supplying cranes for services like loading, unloading, lifting, and shifting qualifies...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the case of Pradeep Kanthed v. Union of India where the Supreme Court issues notice to the Finance Ministry regarding the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax & Ors Vs Safari Retreats Private Limited & Ors (Supreme Court of India) The ...
Goods and Services Tax : The 45th meeting of Goods and Services Tax Council (“GST Council”) is scheduled to be held on September 17, 2021. The Ministry...
Custom Duty, Income Tax : The Karnataka High Court in M/s Pellagic Food Ingredients Private Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ Petition No. 14737/2021[T-CUS] issu...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court dismissed the SLP filed by the Revenue Department, upholding Delhi High Court’s judgment on CENVAT credit refund t...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC quashes order for GST assessment, stating no opportunity was given to reply to Show Cause Notice, violating natural just...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court ruled that Rule 86A of CGST Rules allows negative ITC blocking, irrespective of credit availability in ECL, to c...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh HC ruled GST demand invalid as no proper time was granted to Avexa Corporation for document gathering after GST reg...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court rules that GST orders cannot exceed defects in Show Cause Notice. Case of Tvl. Senthil Hardwares vs. State Tax O...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 32/2015-Central Excise Dated- 4th June, 2015 Ethanol produced from molasses generated from cane crushed in the ...
Service Tax : Circular No. 184/3/2015-ST Dated the 3rd June, 2015 It is further clarified that exemption from service tax still continues to ser...
Custom Duty : the floods in the State of Jammu and Kashmir (the State) from whole of the duty as specified under the First Schedule and whole of...
Excise Duty : Grants exemption from Basic Excise Duty to goods donated or purchased out of cash donations for the relief and rehabilitation of p...
Custom Duty : New posts have been created in the rank of Commissioners of Customs in DRI and DGCEI for adjudication of cases as investigated by ...
Supreme Court dismissed the SLP filed by the Revenue Department, upholding Delhi High Court’s judgment on CENVAT credit refund to BT India.
Madras HC quashes order for GST assessment, stating no opportunity was given to reply to Show Cause Notice, violating natural justice principles.
Madras High Court ruled that Rule 86A of CGST Rules allows negative ITC blocking, irrespective of credit availability in ECL, to curb fraudulent input tax credit.
Andhra Pradesh HC ruled GST demand invalid as no proper time was granted to Avexa Corporation for document gathering after GST registration cancellation.
Madras High Court rules that GST orders cannot exceed defects in Show Cause Notice. Case of Tvl. Senthil Hardwares vs. State Tax Officer.
Madras HC rules limitation period for GST appeals starts from rectification order date, clarifying doubts on timeframes for challenging assessment orders.
Delhi HC rules notices issued to amalgamating companies post-merger are void. Case highlights Section 87 and 160 of CGST Act in HCL Infosystems Ltd. vs CST.
Madras High Court quashes refund rejection order for lack of detailed information in SCN, emphasizing the principle of fair hearing under Audi Alteram Partem.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules that service tax cannot be demanded when tax liability is already settled under Reverse Charge Mechanism.
UP AAAR rules that cream made from 23% vegetable fat is classifiable under HSN 1517 90 90, attracting GST at 5%.
