Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s. Schwing Stetter (India) Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, LTU (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA K. Jitendra Babu
Service Tax Excess payment can be adjusted in Subsequent months not restricted to succeeding month only
Facts of the Case & Contention of the Appellant:-
Appellant is the centrally registered taxpayer and the error committed could not be detected immediately and it took almost a month to recognise the excess payment made in the month of May, 2011 and hence it was adjusted against the tax liabilities for the month of July, 2011. He submits that Rule 6 (4A) of Service Tax Rules allows re-credit in the succeeding month and July 2011 can also be accepted as succeeding to M...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

