Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Adani Enterprises Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) ST No. 22 of 2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Adani Enterprises Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The issue under consideration is whether it is correct to reject the refund on the basis that the registration number of appellant not mention in invoice? The CESTAT states that on the basis of Circular No. 112/6/2009-ST dated 12.03.2009, it is clear that refund claim cannot be rejected merely because the service provider has not mentioned registration number in their invoices. Moreover, there is no dispute raised  by the Revenue on the facts that goods have been exported, service was used for export of go...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930