Case Law Details
Case Name : Indian Acrylic Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh II (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH
Indian Acrylic Ltd.
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh II
FINAL ORDER NOS. 1004 – 1006/2012 SM(BR)
APPEAL NOS. E/1048-1050 OF 2011-SM (BR)
JULY 19, 2012
ORDER
1. All the three appeals are being disposed of by a common order as they arise out of the same impugned orders passed by Commissioner (Appeals).
2. The appellant is a manufacturer of acrylic fibre, acrylic top etc. and were availing the facility of Cenvat credit of duty paid on inputs, capital goods and Service Tax paid on inputs services used in or in relation to manufacture ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
0 Comments
Cancel reply
i have paid pro fees to advocate, the liability as firm is on us pay 100% service tax. we are registered under service Business auxilary (BAS), Goods transport by road and other table service.
can we take credit of service take paid under BAS.
also please tell me that is it required to pay service tax in case in case of other table services.