Learn about the SEBI regulations and emerging trends in regulating insider trading in India, including the challenges and measures to prevent such activities.
The SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations 2015 were implemented by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to regulate insider trading in India. Insider trading refers to the practice of trading in securities by individuals who have access to unpublished price-sensitive information (UPSI). The regulations aim to prevent the misuse of such information by insiders and ensure the integrity of the securities market.
The SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations 2015 replace the earlier regulations on insider trading introduced in 1992. The new regulations provide a more comprehensive framework for regulating insider trading and bring India’s regulations in line with international best practices. All listed entities, their directors, officers, and employees, as well as anyone else with access to UPSI, are subject to the regulation. Any information that is not generally known and that, if made public, would probably have a major impact on the price of the securities is referred to as UPSI. The information may relate to a company’s financial results, mergers and acquisitions, dividends, stock splits, share buybacks, bonus issues, changes in capital structure, or any other information that may have an impact on the company’s financial performance or prospects going forward.
Under the regulations, insider trading is prohibited, and penalties can be imposed for violation of the same. The regulations define insider trading broadly and cover any trading in securities that is based on UPSI. The regulations also require listed entities to establish a code of conduct for prevention of insider trading and to monitor compliance with the regulations.
In addition to the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations 2015, there are other legislations in India that deal with insider trading. The Companies Act 2013, contains provisions that require companies to maintain confidentiality of UPSI and prohibit directors and key managerial personnel from trading in securities while in possession of such information.
There are provisions pertaining to insider trading in the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act 1956 as well. The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 gives SEBI the authority to conduct investigations and impose sanctions for insider trading. The Act stipulates penalties for insider trading.
Emerging Trends and Challenges
Insider trading has been a prominent issue in the securities market in India for a long time. Insiders have occasionally engaged in illegal activities for personal gain despite the strict laws and regulations in place to prevent insider trading. There are new trends and upcoming challenges in the area of insider trading that need to be addressed as India’s securities market continues to develop.
One of the emerging trends in insider trading is the increased use of technology for identifying and preventing insider trading. Companies are using sophisticated algorithms to monitor and analyse trading patterns to detect any suspicious behavior thanks to the advancement in artificial intelligence and machine learning. As businesses increase their technological investments to enhance their compliance programs, this trend is likely to persist.
Another emerging trend is the globalisation of the securities market, which presents new challenges for regulating insider trading. The securities market is becoming more interconnected as more and more companies are going global, which makes it more challenging to monitor and regulate insider trading internationally. Regulators must work together to develop a coordinated approach to regulating insider trading and share information across borders.
Insider trading detection and prevention face new difficulties considering social media’s continued growth. Investors increasingly rely on social media platforms like Twitter and YouTube for information, but these platforms also give insiders a place to share information that may be considered sensitive and private. Regulators must devise new strategies for monitoring online platforms like social media for any suspicious insider trading activity.
The complexity of financial instruments is another obstacle to insider trading regulation. The risk associated with Insider trading has increased with the introduction of new financial instruments like exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and derivatives. By obscuring trading patterns, these tools can make it challenging for regulators to identify insider trading. As the financial landscape changes, regulators must adapt and create new rules to address the risks posed by these instruments.
There is a development in the responsible investing movement that has implications for the regulation of insider trading. When making investment decisions, responsible investors take governance, social, and environmental concerns into account. Transparency and disclosure are given more importance in responsible investing as investors gain a deeper understanding of their significance. Increased scrutiny of businesses and their adherence to insider trading regulation may result from this trend.
Insider trading has been the subject of several high-profile cases in India in recent years, such as the case of Rakesh Agrawal v. SEBI (SAT), Equivalent citations: (2004) 1 CompLJ 193 SAT, 2004 49 SCL 351 SAT dated 03.11.2003 and the case of Shruti Vora v. SEBI (SAT), Appeal (L) No. 28 of 2020 dated 12.02.2020. These incidents have made it clear that robust regulatory measures are required to stop insider trading and preserve the integrity of the securities market.
In recent years, SEBI has increased its efforts to prevent insider trading activities and ensure proper enforcement of the regulation. The regulator has been actively investigating and prosecuting individuals and entities engaged in insider trading activities and has also started taking legal action against companies and their officials for failing to stop insider trading. In a recent instance, SEBI fined a company for failing to set up a sufficient system of internal controls to stop insider trading.
The SEBI has proposed several changes to the regulation to address some of these problems, including the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) (Amendment) Regulation 2018, which strengthened and broadened the regulation. The amendments included provisions requiring the disclosure of trading plans, maintenance of a database of people with access to UPSI and mandatory education for staff members on the subject of insider trading.
Conclusion
Insider trading continues to be a major challenge even though the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations 2015 and other legislations related to insider trading offer a strong and comprehensive framework for regulating insider trading and ensuring the integrity of the securities market in India. To maintain the integrity of the securities market, regulators and market participants must be vigilant and adapt to such changes. Emerging trends and upcoming challenges also need to be addressed. Together, we can prevent insider trading and ensure an honest and open securities market in India by putting in place strong compliance programs. In order to uphold the law and promote an atmosphere of accountability and transparency, market participants must do their part.
Author Bio
