This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Under-Reporting Penalty- AO Didn’t Decide Form 68 in Time: ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mrinalini Jayant Puranik Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Mrinalini Jayant Puranik Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Under-Reporting Penalty- AO Didn’t Decide Form 68 in Time: ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty
Pine Tribunal examined penalty u/s 270A upheld by CIT(A)/NFAC. Assessee had not filed return originally, though TDS statements reflected income of Rs.2.63 crore. On reopening u/s 147, Assessee filed return declaring Rs.70,13,970/-, which AO accepted. AO nevertheless levied penalty of Rs.10,96,347/- for under-reporting, rejecting explanations & refusing immunity.
Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that 90% of tax was already deducted at source (page 6) & that ...






