Case Law Details
Case Name : Mrinalini Jayant Puranik Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mrinalini Jayant Puranik Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Under-Reporting Penalty- AO Didn’t Decide Form 68 in Time: ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty
Pine Tribunal examined penalty u/s 270A upheld by CIT(A)/NFAC. Assessee had not filed return originally, though TDS statements reflected income of Rs.2.63 crore. On reopening u/s 147, Assessee filed return declaring Rs.70,13,970/-, which AO accepted. AO nevertheless levied penalty of Rs.10,96,347/- for under-reporting, rejecting explanations & refusing immunity.
Before Tribunal, Assessee argued that 90% of tax was already deducted at source (page 6) & that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

