Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Metallica Metals India (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Metallica Metals India (ITAT Mumbai) 153C Additions Can’t Rest on Third-Party Statements Alone: ITAT Mumbai Upholds Deletion of Unsecured Loan & Notional Interest ITAT Mumbai (D Bench) in DCIT-CC-8(4) vs Metallica Metals India (ITA Nos. 4289 & 4290/Mum/2025; AYs 2019-20 & 2020-21; order dated 23.12.2025) has dismissed the Revenue’s appeals, affirming the deletion of additions u/s 68 and consequential commission/notional-interest additions made in search-related assessments u/s 153C. Pursuant to a search u/s 132 in a third-party case, the AO treated an unsecured loan...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930