Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

TDS on HUDA EDC Payments Upheld Due to Section 194C Applicability

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 13744
Case Name
ITO Vs Asthetic Township Developers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement

ITO Vs Asthetic Township Developers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

EDC Payments to HUDA Attract TDS u/s 194C: ITAT Delhi Reverses CIT(A), Allows Revenue Appeal

The Delhi ITAT “B” Bench, in ITO v. Asthetic Township Developers Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 2492/Del/2025, AY 2014-15; order dated 29.12.2025), has allowed the Revenue’s appeal and held that payments made towards External Development Charges (EDC) to Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) are liable for TDS u/s 194C, thereby restoring the demand raised u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A).

The Assessing Officer (TDS) had treated the Assessee as an assessee-in-default for non-deduction of tax on EDC payments made to HUDA, holding that such payments constituted income in the hands of HUDA and involved contractual obligations covered u/s 194C. The CIT(A), however, deleted the demand by relying on a Tribunal decision in Shiv Sai Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., without considering binding jurisdictional High Court precedent.

The ITAT noted that the CIT(A) erred in ignoring the judgment of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (159 taxmann.com 444), wherein it was categorically held that EDC payments by developers to HUDA are subject to TDS u/s 194C. Since High Court law is binding on the Tribunal, reliance on a contrary Tribunal ruling was impermissible.

Accordingly, the ITAT quashed the order of the CIT(A), upheld the applicability of section 194C on EDC payments to HUDA, and allowed the Revenue’s appeal, restoring the TDS demand and consequential interest.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 27.02.2025 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl./JCIT(A)- 9, Mumbai (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in DIN & Order No : ITBA/APUS/250/2024-25/1073781605(1) arising out of the order dated 27.03.2023 u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by the ITO, TDS Ward 73(2), Delhi for AY: 2014-15.

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,757

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.