Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Atma Ram Tulsyan and Others (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal Defective No. 232 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/05/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

CIT Vs Atma Ram Tulsyan and Others (Allahabad High Court) – AO was of the view that the possibility of appreciation in the price of shares of lesser known companies in such short period appears to be remote. On this premise, the benefit of capital gains was denied. Evidently, in the absence of any contrary material, it is but obvious that the assessment order was framed on presumptions and assumptions. The other aspect of the case is that at no stage, except doubting the sale transactions, the Department doubted the documents which were produced by the assessee to substantiate his claim with regard to capital gains. This being so, the Tribunal on appreciation of evidence has rightly found that the transactions in question are genuine transactions. It is a finding of fact based on appraisal of evidence. We do not find that any substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. The appeal has no merit.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Chief Justice’s Court

1. Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 232 of 2009

Petitioner :- Commissioner Of Income Tax

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031