Case Law Details
Case Name : S55 Keerippatty Primary Agricultural Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
S55 Keerippatty Primary Agricultural Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
The ITAT Chennai set aside the CIT(A)’s order and held that once the delay in filing the return is condoned u/s 119(2)(b), the very basis for denying deduction u/s 80P disappears.
The assessee, a Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society (PACCS), filed its return for AY 2020-21 belatedly due to statutory audit under the TN Co-operative Societies Act being completed late. The CPC denied 80P in the 143(1) intimation solely because the return was not filed within the due date u/s 139(1).
Subsequently, t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
One Comment
Cancel reply
RETURN FILED UNDER SECTION 119 (2) (B) ON 01.06.2022 FOR THE A.Y. 2018-19 CLAIMING REFUND OF RS. 1,07,499/-, AFTER RECEIVING THE CONDONATION LETTER FROM PCIT. THERE IS NO RESPONSE FROM AO OR CPC. WHAT ACTION TO BE TAKEN FURTHER TO PROCESS THE RETURN.