Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahatma Phule Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakar Pat Sanstha Vs PCIT-1 (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mahatma Phule Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakar Pat Sanstha Vs PCIT-1 (ITAT Pune) PCIT Rightly Invokes Section 263 for Allowing Section 80P Deduction in Belated Return — ITAT Pune Upholds Revision The Pune Bench of the ITAT dismissed the assessee’s appeal and upheld the revisionary order passed under section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had erroneously allowed deduction under section 80P in a case where the assessee failed to file its return of income within the time prescribed under section 139(1), in clear violation of section 80AC (applicable from AY 2018-19). Key takeaways from...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930