Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohsin Himmati Vs ADIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohsin Himmati Vs ADIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Father’s Bank-Funded Payments Allowed as Cost of Acquisition — ITAT Hyderabad Grants Full LTCG Relief The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2023-24, holding that payments made by the father of the assessee towards purchase of property, duly supported by bank statements, constitute valid cost of acquisition and cannot be disallowed while computing long-term capital gains. Key findings of the Tribunal: Facts of the case: The assessee (a non-resident) sold an immovable property for ₹2.31 crore. The prop...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930