Case Law Details
Ramesh Raj Bohra Vs DCIT (ITAT Jodhpur)
The issue under consideration is whether sale of agricultural land after conversion will tax under capital gain or under business income?
ITAT states that, the land was purchased by the assessee since long back as capita asset and was continuously hold by it for 20 years in case of Fateh Royal Residency and for 4-5 years in case of Fateh Hills as capital asset. There was no intention of assessee to trade for the land so purchased, contrary it was used for agricultural purposes continuously till the year of sale. Agricultural income so earned were offered in the return of income of respective years and accepted by the department. Similarly, the Fateh Hills property was acquired long back in the year 2010-11 as capital asset and was so held as capital asset in the balance sheet. Merely conversion of the agricultural land into non-agricultural land will not give rise to the taxable event until it is actually sold. Thus, the assessee has sold the capital asset held for long term, accordingly, gain arising from sale was eligible for deduction U/s 54F of the Act. Accordingly, ITAT direct the A.O. to treat the property on sale of land as capital gains and given the benefit of exemption claimed by the assessee U/s 54F of the Act. ITAT direct accordingly.
FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
