Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Ajay Singh (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Ajay Singh (ITAT Agra) ATM Cash, Not Assessee’s Cash – ITAT Agra Upholds Deletion of ₹8.84 Cr Addition Made on Bank Error Revenue challenged CIT(A)’s order deleting ₹8.84 crore added u/s 69A, which AO treated as unexplained money based on large cash transactions in Assessee’s bank-linked accounts. AO found cash deposits & withdrawals of ₹8.81 crore from Punjab & Sind Bank accounts & , in the absence of a return or explanation, taxed the same as unexplained money u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE. Before CIT(A), Assessee produced proof showing he was an employee of ISS SDB ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930