Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pooja Prabhakar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pooja Prabhakar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) JAO Can’t Issue Reopening Notice Post-Faceless Scheme: ITAT Chennai Quashes 148 & Entire Reassessment for AY 2018-19 Chennai ITAT allowed the appeal of Ms. Pooja Prabhakar for AY 2018-19, condoned a delay of 259 days, and quashed the reassessment proceedings in entirety after holding that the notice u/s 148 issued by the Jurisdictional AO (JAO) on 31-03-2022 was invalid being contrary to section 151A and the Faceless Reassessment Scheme notified on 29-03-2022 The Assessee had not filed a return for AY 2018-19. Based on information regarding fixed dep...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930