Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Kumar Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Quashed for Mechanical & Undated Sanction u/s 151 – Non-Application of Mind Vitiates Entire Proceedings The Delhi ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed the reassessment for AY 2013-14 on the ground that the mandatory approval under Section 151 was granted in a purely mechanical and defective manner, rendering the assumption of jurisdiction invalid. The Tribunal found that in the approval proforma, the Assessing Officer failed to even mention that the original assessment had been completed under Section 143(3), and the PCIT reco...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930