Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ram Khilari Meena Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ram Khilari Meena Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

Reassessment Invalid If No Addition on Original Reason – ITAT Jaipur Follows Jurisdictional HC

The case was reopened based on information of cash deposits of ₹11.10 lakh in Assessee’s bank account. During reassessment, AO accepted the explanation for cash deposits but made an addition of ₹21 lakh as Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of land & building, even though LTCG was not the reason for reopening.

CIT(A) held

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Routine Business Cash Deposits Not Taxable Despite No ITR Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition Overturned for Earlier Property Booking Revenue’s Section 68 Challenge Rejected on Evidence and Repayment Advance Loss Treated as Trading Loss: ITAT Allows ₹1.5 Cr Write-Off Finance Broker Taxed Only on Brokerage as No Evidence of Income Found View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031