Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ram Khilari Meena Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ram Khilari Meena Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Reassessment Invalid If No Addition on Original Reason – ITAT Jaipur Follows Jurisdictional HC The case was reopened based on information of cash deposits of ₹11.10 lakh in Assessee’s bank account. During reassessment, AO accepted the explanation for cash deposits but made an addition of ₹21 lakh as Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of land & building, even though LTCG was not the reason for reopening. CIT(A) held that AO was empowered u/s 147 to assess “any other income” coming to his notice during reassessment, relying on Mehak Finve...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930