Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : G. Veerabhadri Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
G. Veerabhadri Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) No Reassessment for 2015–16 If Notice Issued on or After 1st April 2021: Karnataka HC Follows Rajeev Bansal Petitioner challenged reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2015–16. The impugned actions included the notice u/s 148A(b) dated 29.03.2022, the order u/s 148A(d), the consequent reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, as well as subsequent penalty and demand notices. Petitioner argued that the reassessment was void in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal [2024] 167 taxmann.com 70 (SC). The Supreme Co...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930