Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P Cube Construction Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
P Cube Construction Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee’s appeal & deleted penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) for AY 2011-12, holding that penalty cannot survive where addition is sustained purely on estimation basis. In the quantum proceedings, the AO had treated purchases as bogus & made addition of ₹83.98 lakh. The CIT(A) restricted the addition to 12.5%, sustaining only ₹10.49 lakh as estimated profit element, which was later upheld by ITAT. Based on this sustained addition, the AO levied penalty at 300% of tax sought to be evaded. The Tribuna...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid Even if Based on Material from Alleged Illegal Search: Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: Karnataka HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void: Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031