Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Atma Ram Builders Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Atma Ram Builders Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) PCIT Cannot Direct Penalty Initiation under Section 271E: ITAT Quashes 263 Order for Want of AO’s Satisfaction The Delhi ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and set aside the revision order passed under Section 263, holding that the PCIT had no jurisdiction to direct initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271E in the absence of satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order. The case arose from an alleged violation of Section 269T based on the tax audit report showing repayment of ₹11 lakh otherwise tha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930