Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax III Vs Shonkh Technology Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
A perusal of the reasons recorded by the AO in the present case shows that there was no rational or intelligible nexus between the reasons recorded by him and the belief entertained about the escapement of income of the assessee company. There was nothing in the said reasons to show existence of any positive income arising to the assessee company which was assessable in his hands and the belief entertained by the AO was based merely on assumption and surmises. The reasons recorded by him do not show the process of reasoning which could lead to reason to believe that any income of the assessee...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Prakash Kumar says:

    It seems that the gist of the judgement of the Delhi High Court has been wrongly stated. It is evident that the gist of the ITAT’s decision has been stated, by failing to appreciate that the same stands reversed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court by the decision dated 10th July, 2012 in ITA 1325/2009, + ITA 525/2010, + ITA 1697/2010 in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III versus SHONKH TECHNOLOGY LTD. Please correct the aforesaid mistake.

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to Prakash Kumar

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930