This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Non-Service of notice U/s. 143(2) at correct address of assesse within prescribed time limit makes notice invalid
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs Abacus Distribution Systems (India)Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
It is undisputed position before us that the notice under Section 143(2) of the Act which was handed over to the post office on 30th November, 2007 was incorrectly addressed i.e. it was addressed to the respondent assessee’s old office at Nariman Point, Mumbai. In terms of Section 282 of the Act as existing in 2007 a notice may be served on the person named therein either by post or as if it were a summons issued by the Court under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Section 27 of the General Clauses Act provides that where any Central Act requires a document to be served by post where the ex...





