Mere fact that the asset purchased had been leased back & vendor had undertaken to pay lease charges can not per se lead to the conclusion that transaction is sham

IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH ‘C’

Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

V/s.

Prithvi Prakashan (P.) Ltd.

IT Appeal NO.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.