This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Foreign remittance from disclosed LTCG can’t be treated as unexplained: ITAT Ahmedabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Tejash Mahendrabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Tejash Mahendrabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Foreign remittance from disclosed LTCG can’t be treated as unexplained: ITAT Ahmedabad deletes ₹1.03 cr addition
Ahmedabad Tribunal allowed Assessee’s appeal & deleted addition of ₹1,03,43,401 u/s 69A made on account of capital introduced during the year. Tribunal noted that the impugned amount represented remittance from Assessee’s own US bank account to ICICI Bank, India, & source stood fully explained as long-term capital gains on sale of shares in AY 2012-13, which were disclosed, scrutinised & accepted u/s 143(3) r.w....




