Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tejash Mahendrabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tejash Mahendrabhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Foreign remittance from disclosed LTCG can’t be treated as unexplained: ITAT Ahmedabad deletes ₹1.03 cr addition Ahmedabad Tribunal allowed Assessee’s appeal & deleted addition of ₹1,03,43,401 u/s 69A made on account of capital introduced during the year. Tribunal noted that the impugned amount represented remittance from Assessee’s own US bank account to ICICI Bank, India, & source stood fully explained as long-term capital gains on sale of shares in AY 2012-13, which were disclosed, scrutinised & accepted u/s 143(3) r.w....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930