Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Trupti Shukla Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Trupti Shukla Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) ITAT Raipur Deletes Sec 69A Addition – Cash Deposits in Joint Account Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Husband Owns the Money In Trupti Shukla vs ITO (AY 2017-18), the ITAT Raipur allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted addition of ₹52.24 lakh made u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE on cash deposits in a joint bank account. The assessee, a school teacher, explained that deposits were made by her husband — a separate taxpayer — from business receipts and past savings, and supporting declarations, ITRs and bank statements were furnished  The Tribunal ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930