Case Law Details
Case Name : Sanjay Kothari (HUF) Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjay Kothari (HUF) Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai Restricts 14A Disallowance to Actual Expenses of ₹69,455 & Deletes ₹1.26 Cr Addition Treating Excess Refund of Advance as Capital Receipt
Assessee–HUF filed appeal against the NFAC order sustaining two additions: (i) ₹6,74,600 u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D, & (ii) ₹1,26,32,970 treating excess refund of advance from its Karta (Mr. Sanjay Kothari, individual) as taxable income.
1. Section 14A / Rule 8D Disallowance – Partly Allowed
The assessee earned exempt income of ₹2.34 crore but made no 14A di...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


