Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Kothari (HUF) Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjay Kothari (HUF) Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Restricts 14A Disallowance to Actual Expenses of ₹69,455 & Deletes ₹1.26 Cr Addition Treating Excess Refund of Advance as Capital Receipt Assessee–HUF filed appeal against the NFAC order sustaining two additions: (i) ₹6,74,600 u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D, & (ii) ₹1,26,32,970 treating excess refund of advance from its Karta (Mr. Sanjay Kothari, individual) as taxable income. 1. Section 14A / Rule 8D Disallowance – Partly Allowed The assessee earned exempt income of ₹2.34 crore but made no 14A di...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031