Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mukul Banerjee Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mukul Banerjee Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Kolkata   ITAT   condoned a delay of 2581 days in filing appeal, holding that the delay was supported by reasonable cause, and restored the matter to AO for fresh adjudication subject to cost of ₹25,000 payable to Legal Aid Services, Calcutta High Court Assessee contended that he was unaware of CIT(A)’s order as it had not been physically served, and came to know of it only upon checking the e-filing portal much later. He filed an affidavit explaining the delay & offered to bear a cost of ₹25,000. ITAT noted that both AO & CIT(A) had passe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930